Reference health
Equity or Disparity: Do Performance Funding Policies Disadvantage 2-Year Minority-Serving Institutions?
14/14 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
51 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 14 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/app.2.3.129
Why Have College Completion Rates Declined? An Analysis of Changing Student Preparation and Collegiate Resources
resolves10.1353/rhe.2005.0081
Equity and Efficiency of Community College Appropriations: The Role of Local Financing
resolves10.1007/s11162-017-9483-x
Mitigating Unintended Impacts? The Effects of Premiums for Underserved Populations in Performance-Funding Policies for Higher Education
resolves10.3102/0162373714560224
Evaluating the Impacts of “New” Performance Funding in Higher Education
resolves10.1080/10508400709336942
Fast Kids, Slow Kids, Lazy Kids: Framing the Mismatch Problem in Mathematics Teachers' Conversations
resolves10.3102/00028312041004797
The Impact of Accountability on Racial and Socioeconomic Equity: Considering Both School Resources and Achievement Outcomes
resolves10.1002/cc.337
Using state student unit record data to increase community college student success
resolves10.1007/s11162-016-9444-9
Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0
resolves10.1080/10668926.2016.1179601
The Point of the Point: Washington’s Student Achievement Initiative through the Looking Glass of a Community College
resolves10.1080/00221546.2016.1243948
Performance-Based Funding for Community Colleges: Are Colleges Disadvantaged by Serving the Most Disadvantaged Students?
The 51 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Association of Community Colleges. (2017). Fast facts 2017. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.aacc.nche.edu/research-trends/fast-facts/
no DOI — not checkedBaime D., Baum S. (2016). Community colleges: Multiple missions, diverse student bodies, and a range of policy solutions. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/research/publication/community-colleges-multiple-missions-diverse-student-bodies-and-range-policy-solutions
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of research in education finance and policy
no DOI — not checkedBelfield C. R. (2012). Washington state Student Achievement Initiative: Achievement points analysis for academic years 2007–2011. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Performance-Funding.html?all=1
no DOI — not checkedThe measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological and empirical dimensions
no DOI — not checkedBoland C., Gasman M. (2016, October 9). When states make higher education decisions despite the evidence. The Hill. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/education/299918-when-states-make-higher-education-decisions-despite-the-evidence
no DOI — not checkedCalifornia Department of Education. (n.d.). Local control funding formula overview. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/lcffoverview.asp
no DOI — not checkedCenter for Minority Serving Institutions. (2015). On their own terms: Two-year Minority Serving Institutions. Philadelphia, PA: Author. Retrieved from https://cmsi.gse.upenn.edu/content/reports
no DOI — not checkedCenter for Minority Serving Institutions. (n.d.). MSI Directory [Data set]. Philadelphia, PA: Author. Retrieved from https://cmsi.gse.upenn.edu/content/msi-directory
no DOI — not checkedInterdisciplinary approaches to understanding Minority Serving Institutions
no DOI — not checkedMinority Serving Institutions: Doing more with less
no DOI — not checkedDowd A. C., Shieh L. T. (2013). Community college financing: Equity, efficiency, and accountability. The NEA Almanac of Higher Education, 37-65. http://www.nea.org/home/55288.htm#
no DOI — not checkedPresented at meeting of State Student Data Project for Community College Bridges to Opportunity and Achieving the Dream
no DOI — not checkedGándara D. (2016). Constructing “winners and losers”: An analysis of higher education performance funding policy designs in Colorado and Texas (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10724/36109
no DOI — not checkedGarcia S. (2018). Gaps in college spending shortchange students of color. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2018/04/03090823/Gaps-in-College-Spending-brief.pdf
no DOI — not checkedGasman M., Conrad C. F. (2013). Educating all students: Minority Serving Institutions. Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/339
no DOI — not checkedHCM Strategists. (2011). Performance funding in Indiana: An analysis of lessons from the research and other state models. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://hcmstrategists.com/wp-content/themes/hcmstrategists/docs/Indiana_Report_12.pdf
no DOI — not checkedOutcomes-based funding in historical and comparative context
no DOI — not checkedJenkins D., Shulock N. (2013). Metrics, dollars, and systems change: Learning from Washington state’s Student Achievement Initiative to design effective postsecondary performance funding policies. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Performance-Funding.html?all=1
no DOI — not checkedJenkins D., Wachen J., Moore C., Shulock N. (2012). Washington state Student Achievement Initiative policy study: Final report. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Performance-Funding.html?all=1
no DOI — not checkedJones T. (2014). Performance funding at MSIs: Considerations and possible measures for public Minority-Serving Institutions. Atlanta, GA: Southern Education Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.southerneducation.org/Our-Strategies/Research-and-Publications/Performance-Funding-at-MSIs.aspx
no DOI — not checkedKaikkonen D. (2016). Washington’s community and technical colleges’ Student Achievement Initiative: Lessons learned since the 2012 revision and considerations for new allocation model. Olympia: Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. Retrieved from https://www.sbctc.edu/resources/documents/colleges-staff/research/research-reports/16-1-sai-performance-growth-final.pdf
no DOI — not checkedLahr H., Pheatt L., Dougherty K. J., Jones S. M., Natow R. S., Reddy V. (2014, November). Unintended impacts of performance funding on community colleges and universities in three states (CCRC Working Paper No. 78). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Performance-Funding.html?all=1
no DOI — not checkedLegislative Budget Board. (2013). Financing higher education in Texas legislative primer. Austin, TX: Legislative Budget Board. Retrieved from http://www.lbb.state.tx.us/Documents/Publications/Primer/690_Higher_Education_Finance.pdf
no DOI — not checkedLi A. Y., Zumeta W. (2016). Performance funding on the ground: Campus responses and perspectives in two states. New York, NY: TIAA Institute. Retrieved from https://www.tiaainstitute.org/publication/performance-funding-ground-campus-responses
no DOI — not checkedBridging the higher education divide: Strengthening community colleges and restoring the American dream
no DOI — not checkedMinding the dream: The process and practice of the American community college
no DOI — not checkedThe theory of public finance: A study in public economy
no DOI — not checkedA guidebook on state budgeting for higher education
no DOI — not checkedNational Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Performance-based funding for higher education. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx
no DOI — not checkedNess E. C., Deupree M. M., Gándara D. (2015). Campus responses to outcomes-based funding in Tennessee: Robust, aligned, and contested. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
no DOI — not checkedOffice of Civil Rights. (n.d.). Minority Serving Institutions program. Retrieved from https://www.doi.gov/pmb/eeo/doi-minority-serving-institutions-program
no DOI — not checkedOhio Board of Regents. (2014). State share of instruction report. Columbus: Ohio Board of Regents. Retrieved from https://www.ohiohighered.org/sites/ohiohighered.org/files/uploads/financial/ssi/SSI_Performance-Based-Funding-Evaluation-Report_Dec2014.pdf
no DOI — not checkedShapiro D., Dundar A., Ziskin M., Chiang Y.C., Chen J., Harrell A., Torres V. (2013, August). Baccalaureate attainment: A national view of the postsecondary outcomes of students who transfer from two-year to four-year institutions (Signature Report No. 5). Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/signaturereport5/
no DOI — not checkedShulock N., Jenkins D. (2011). Performance incentives to improve community college completion: Learning from Washington state’s Student Achievement Initiative. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Performance-Funding.html?all=1
no DOI — not checkedSnyder M., Fox B. (2016). Driving better outcomes: Fiscal year 2016 state status and typology update. Washington, DC: HCM Strategists. Retrieved from http://hcmstrategists.com/drivingoutcomes/
no DOI — not checkedState Higher Education Executive Officers. (2016). SHEF: FY 2015. Boulder, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers. Retrieved from http://sheeo.org/sites/default/files/SHEEO_SHEF_2016_Report.pdf
no DOI — not checkedTennessee Higher Education Commission. (2011). 2012-13 state appropriation recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/thec/cm/2011/CMFall2011_I.C.%20State%20Appropriation%20Recommendations.pdf
no DOI — not checkedStudent success points: An overview
no DOI — not checkedTexas Association of Community Colleges. (2017). Fall enrollment: 2008-2016: Texas community colleges. Retrieved from http://www.tacc.org/uploads/tinymce/data%20and%20info/enrollment/bycollege08_16.pdf
no DOI — not checkedTexas Association of Community Colleges. (n.d.). Student success points. Retrieved from http://www.tacc.org/pages/data-and-info/student-success-points
no DOI — not checkedTexas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (n.d.). High school graduates enrolled Texas higher education [Data files]. Retrieved from http://www.txhighereddata.org/index.cfm?objectId=2783AAA6-ADCB-E35A-5BFC8F501DC1D65A
no DOI — not checkedTexas State Technical College. (n.d.). Texas State Technical College campuses throughout Texas. Retrieved from http://www.tstc.edu/campuses/campuses
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Department of Education. (2014). Higher education act of 1965. Retrieved from http://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/HEA65_CMD.pdf
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). AANAPISI fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/list/asian-americans-initiative/facts-data.html
no DOI — not checkedbibr60-0091552118778776
no DOI — not checkedWashington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. (2011). Student progress and success. Retrieved from https://www.sbctc.edu/resources/documents/colleges-staff/research/academic-year-research/2010-11/4progress_1011-ayr.pdf
no DOI — not checkedWashington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. (2014). Student progress and success. Retrieved from https://www.sbctc.edu/resources/documents/colleges-staff/research/academic-year-research/2013-14/4-progress-and-success-1314-final.pdf
no DOI — not checkedWashington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. (2015). 2014-15: Expenditures. Retrieved from https://www.sbctc.edu/resources/documents/colleges-staff/research/academic-year-research/2014-15/AYR-Expenditures-2014-15.pdf
no DOI — not checkedWashington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. (2018a). Our colleges. Retrieved from https://www.sbctc.edu/our-colleges/default.aspx
no DOI — not checkedWashington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. (2018b). Student Achievement Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.sbctc.edu/about/agency/initiatives-projects/student-achievement-initiative.aspx
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0091552118778776"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0091552118778776/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0091552118778776)