Reference health

Which Spoken Language Markers Identify Deception in High-Stakes Settings? Evidence From Earnings Conference Calls

https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x15586792
CiteStamped reference-health badge
55/55 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 55 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2224/sbp.2003.31.7.687
LINGUISTIC STYLES IN DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION: DUBITATIVE AMBIGUITY AND ELLIPTIC ELUDING IN PACKAGED LIES
resolves10.3115/1599081.1599087
Verification and implementation of language-based deception indicators in civil and criminal narratives
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.002
Discussion of “Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence”
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00448.x
Discussion of Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls
resolves10.1002/acp.1087
Language of lies in prison: linguistic classification of prisoners' truthful and deceptive natural language
resolves10.1080/0163853X.2014.942833
His Lips Are Moving: Pinocchio Effect and Other Lexical Indicators of Political Deceptions
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
Interpersonal Deception Theory
resolves10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic170
Interpersonal Deception Theory
resolves10.1080/03637759609376374
Interpersonal deception: XII. Information management dimensions underlying deceptive and truthful messages
resolves10.1177/0261927X05284482
The Dynamic Nature of Deceptive Verbal Communication
resolves10.1186/s13388-014-0008-2
Automated deception detection of 911 call transcripts
resolves10.1108/09513579810231457
Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Cues to deception.
resolves10.1017/S0142716410000068
The linguistic correlates of conversational deception: Comparing natural language processing technologies
resolves10.1111/j.0022-2879.2007.00034.x
Communication by Central Bank Committee Members: Different Strategies, Same Effectiveness?
resolves10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575
Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception<sup>†</sup>
resolves10.1007/s10726-012-9339-x
The Sound of Trust: Voice as a Measurement of Trust During Interactions with Embodied Conversational Agents
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00321.x
Training Lie Detectors to Use Nonverbal Cues Instead of Global Heuristics
resolves10.1007/s10726-012-9300-z
An Examination and Validation of Linguistic Constructs for Studying High-Stakes Deception
resolves10.2308/jeta.2010.7.1.25
Can Linguistic Predictors Detect Fraudulent Financial Filings?
resolves10.1080/01638530701739181
On Lying and Being Lied To: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02025.x
Hungry like the wolf: A word‐pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths
resolves10.1037/a0023589
Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
resolves10.1177/1088868314556539
Are Computers Effective Lie Detectors? A Meta-Analysis of Linguistic Cues to Deception
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00433.x
Analyzing Speech to Detect Financial Misreporting
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00365.x
Does Silence Speak? An Empirical Analysis of Disclosure Choices During Conference Calls
resolves10.1093/oso/9780198529613.003.0003
Vocal expression of affect
resolves10.2308/accr.00000022
Voluntary Disclosure to Influence Investor Reactions to Merger Announcements: An Examination of Conference Calls
resolves10.1002/acp.2879
Sorting the Liars from the Truth Tellers: The Benefits of Asking Unanticipated Questions on Lie Detection
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00450.x
Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls
resolves10.2308/jis.2009.23.1.24
Features of Computer-Mediated, Text-Based Messages that Support Automatable, Linguistics-Based Indicators for Deception Detection
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2426504
Scripted Earnings Conference Calls as a Signal of Future Firm Performance
resolves10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks
resolves10.1111/jofi.12162
Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures
resolves10.2308/accr-10034
What Makes Conference Calls Useful? The Information Content of Managers' Presentations and Analysts' Discussion Sessions
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00285.x
Evidence of Management Discrimination Among Analysts during Earnings Conference Calls
resolves10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.001
Voice pitch and the labor market success of male chief executive officers
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01705.x
The Power of Voice: Managerial Affective States and Future Firm Performance
resolves10.1080/03637759209376245
Information manipulation theory
resolves10.1177/0261927X14534656
Information Manipulation Theory 2
resolves10.1177/0146167203029005010
Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00321.x
Explaining Gender-Based Language Use: Effects of Gender Identity Salience on References to Emotion and Tentative Language in Intra- and Intergroup Contexts
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00046.x
SPOKEN LANGUAGE INDICES OF UNCERTAINTY
resolves10.1002/acp.1190
Paraverbal indicators of deception: a meta‐analytic synthesis
resolves10.1177/0261927X11407165
Double-Bind Accountability Dilemmas: Impression Management and Accountability Strategies Used by Senior Banking Executives
resolves10.1177/0261927X09351676
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
resolves10.1037/h0093929
Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.
resolves10.1080/0163853X.2011.633331
Evidence for the Pinocchio Effect: Linguistic Differences Between Lies, Deception by Omissions, and Truths
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x
Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*
resolves10.1023/A:1006610329284
Detecting Deceit via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior
resolves10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003
Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load
resolves10.2466/pms.1986.62.3.875
A Dictionary of Affect in Language: IV. Reliability, Validity, and Applications
resolves10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6f
Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-Based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communications
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60369-X
Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBoersma P., Weenink D. (2006). Praat [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
no DOI — not checkedStrategic interpersonal communication
no DOI — not checkedDiscovering hidden temporal patterns in behavior and interaction: T-pattern detection and analysis with THEME
no DOI — not checkedEaglesham J. (2013, May 27). Accounting fraud targeted: With crisis-related enforcement ebbing, SEC is turning back to main street. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324125504578509241215284044
no DOI — not checkedFederal Bureau of Investigation. (2011). Financial crimes report to the public. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/financial-crimes-report-2010-2011
no DOI — not checkedbibr26-0261927X15586792
no DOI — not checkedStudies in the way of words
no DOI — not checkedMessage production: Advances in communication theory
no DOI — not checkedNonverbal communication
no DOI — not checkedbibr51-0261927X15586792
no DOI — not checkedMoffitt K. C., Giboney J. S., Ehrhardt E., Burgoon J. K., Nunamaker J. F. (2012). Structured programming for linguistic cue extraction (SPLICE). In Jensen M. L., Meservy T. O., Burgoon J. K., Nunamaker J. F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the HICSS-45 Rapid Screening Technologies, Deception Detection and Credibility Assessment Symposium (pp. 103-108). Retrieved from http://www.hicss.hawaii.edu/Reports/HICSS45_RapidScreeningTechnologiesDeceptionDetectionandCredibilityAssessmentSymposium.pdf
no DOI — not checkedStatistical methods
no DOI — not checkedPsychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence
no DOI — not checkedLanguage within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x15586792"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x15586792/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x15586792/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x15586792)