Reference health
You Liar! Attributions of Lying
3 of 39 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-25
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.77.3.525
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.979
The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.10.002
Human lie-detection performance: Does random assignment versus self-selection of liars and truth-tellers matter?
resolves10.1177/0265407501184002
Deception in Romantic Relationships: Subjective Estimates of Success at Deceiving and Attitudes toward Deception
resolves10.1080/00224545.2017.1327404
When is a lie acceptable? Work and private life lying acceptance depends on its beneficiary
resolves10.1007/s10447-015-9243-6
Pinocchio’s Nose in Therapy: Therapists’ Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Client Deception
resolves10.1176/appi.prcp.20190046
Pathological Lying: Theoretical and Empirical Support for a Diagnostic Entity
resolves10.1002/acp.3665
Liars are perceived as more credible than truth‐tellers who recall a repeated event
resolves10.1080/10510974.2016.1146911
When Is It Acceptable to Lie? Interpersonal and Intergroup Perspectives on Deception
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60107-0
From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception
resolves10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00094.x
The enigma of altruistic lying: Perspective differences in what motivates and justifies lie telling within romantic relationships
resolves10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.001
Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars: The benefit of examining core and peripheral details.
resolves10.1177/0146167292185006
Measuring Causal Attributions: The Revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII)
resolves10.1515/9781503626607-010
8. Leaps and Lapses of Faith: Exploring the Relationship Between Trust and Deception
resolves10.1177/0146167203254610
The Fundamental Attribution Error in Detecting Deception: The Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf Effect
resolves10.1177/0261927X980172001
Truth, Equivocation Concealment, and Lies in Job Applications and Doctor-Patient Communication
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x
The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies
resolves10.1353/mpq.2002.0009
Emergence of White-Lie Telling in Children Between 3 and 7 Years of Age
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0225566
Lie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe fables of Aesop: With a life of the author and embellished with one hundred and twelve plates
no DOI — not checkedAquinas T. (1947). Question 145: Of honesty (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.) The Summa Theologica. Benziger Bros. (Original work published 1485). https://www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/SS/SS145.html#SSQ145OUTP1
no DOI — not checkedThe basic works of Aristotle
no DOI — not checkedCognitive behavior therapy, basics and beyond
no DOI — not checkedLying: Moral choice in public and private life
no DOI — not checkedbibr13-0261927X21999692
no DOI — not checkedbibr16-0261927X21999692
no DOI — not checkedHart C. L. (2019). What is a lie? Defining different elements of dishonesty. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-nature-deception/201905/what-is-lie
no DOI — not checkedAttribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior
no DOI — not checkedbibr32-0261927X21999692
no DOI — not checkedbibr34-0261927X21999692
no DOI — not checkedKing L. W. (2008). The code of Hammurabi. Retrieved November 2, 2020, from https://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hamframe.asp
no DOI — not checkedDuped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception
no DOI — not checkedThe paradox of the liar
no DOI — not checkedDetecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice
no DOI — not checkedDetecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities
no DOI — not checkedLanguage, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x21999692"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x21999692/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0261927x21999692)