Reference health
Understanding business intelligence system continuance intention
48/48 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 48 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/249577
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?
resolves10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.032
Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.
resolves10.2307/3250921
Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
resolves10.2307/25148634
Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Tech Nology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test1
resolves10.1287/isre.8.4.342
Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation
resolves10.2307/249008
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
resolves10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/j.accinf.2008.03.001
Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance
resolves10.1177/002224378101800104
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
resolves10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X
Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use
resolves10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009
Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet
resolves10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663
Explaining employees' Extended Use of complex information systems
resolves10.1108/02635570410567757
Determinants of continued use of the WWW: an integration of two theoretical models
resolves10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000532
Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model
resolves10.1080/07421222.1995.11518061
Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01315.x
Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System
resolves10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use
resolves10.2307/249751
Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs1
resolves10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model
resolves10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.006
Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model
resolves10.2307/25148817
How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance1
resolves10.1287/isre.2.3.173
Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior
resolves10.1287/isre.2.3.192
Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation
resolves10.1177/002224378001700405
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
resolves10.1016/j.im.2008.06.002
Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of information systems
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00285.x
Examining the Impact of Pre‐Implementation Expectations on Post‐Implementation Use of Enterprise Systems: A Longitudinal Study
resolves10.1016/j.compind.2015.01.003
Assessing the impact of enterprise systems technological characteristics on user continuance behavior: An empirical study in China
resolves10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001
The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance
resolves10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
resolves10.2307/3250981
Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior1
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedbibr10-0266666915599588
no DOI — not checkedBelief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An introduction to theory and research
no DOI — not checkedGartner CIO Agenda Report
no DOI — not checkedMultivariate Data Analysis
no DOI — not checkedMultivariate Data Analysis
no DOI — not checkedbibr23-0266666915599588
no DOI — not checkedHowson C (2010) Ease of Use and Interface Appeal in Business Intelligence Tools. Boulder, CO: BeyeNETWORK, 1–21.
no DOI — not checkedbibr34-0266666915599588
no DOI — not checkedbibr37-0266666915599588
no DOI — not checkedbibr38-0266666915599588
no DOI — not checkedPsychometric Theory
no DOI — not checkedAdvances in Services Marketing and Management: Research and practice
no DOI — not checkedResearch Paper G00173700 G
no DOI — not checkedbibr62-0266666915599588
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0266666915599588"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0266666915599588/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0266666915599588)