Reference health
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*
52/52 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-21
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 52 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
resolves10.1111/ejn.13519
Registered reports at the <i>European Journal of Neuroscience</i>: consolidating and extending peer‐reviewed study pre‐registration
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement
resolves10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.017
Animal models and the prediction of efficacy in clinical trials of analgesic drugs: A critical appraisal and call for uniform reporting standards
resolves10.1111/j.1751-0813.1995.tb07534.x
Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the <i>Australian Veterinary Journal</i>
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0007824
Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
resolves10.1080/17482960701856300
Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS
resolves10.1002/jgm.1473
Animal Research: Reporting <i>In Vivo</i> Experiments: The ARRIVE Guidelines
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
resolves10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192278
Animal Research: Reporting <i>In Vivo</i> Experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines
resolves10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053793
Animal Research: Reporting <i>In Vivo</i> Experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines
resolves10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00873.x
Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines
resolves10.1111/j.1939-165X.2012.00418.x
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The <scp>ARRIVE</scp> Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
resolves10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
resolves10.4103/0976-500X.72351
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0166733
The Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0197882
ARRIVE has not ARRIVEd: Support for the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines does not improve the reporting quality of papers in animal welfare, analgesia or anesthesia
resolves10.1186/s41073-019-0069-3
A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)
resolves10.1136/bmjos-2017-000035
Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0183591
A checklist is associated with increased quality of reporting preclinical biomedical research: A systematic review
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0165999
The Researchers’ View of Scientific Rigor—Survey on the Conduct and Reporting of In Vivo Research
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
resolves10.1038/nature11556
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
resolves10.1038/sdata.2016.18
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
resolves10.7717/peerj.3208
Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark?
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0175583
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices
resolves10.1124/mol.119.118927
New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data and Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods in Experimental Biology
resolves10.1136/jme.2008.024299
A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
resolves10.1007/s11948-007-9011-z
A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines
resolves10.1111/bph.14153
Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedKilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments-the ARRIVE Guidelines. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011. Epub 2011/01/06. doi: jcbfm2010220 [pii] 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.220. PubMed PMID: 21206507.
no DOI — not checkedHurst V, Percie du Sert N. The ARRIVE guidelines survey. Open Science Framework 2017. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/G8T5Q.
no DOI — not checkedThe Academy of Medical Sciences. Reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research: improving research practice 2015. Available from: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/policy/policy-projects/reproducibility-and-reliability-of-biomedical-research. [cited 16 June 2020].
no DOI — not checkedbibr47-0271678X20943823
no DOI — not checkedbibr48-0271678X20943823
no DOI — not checkedUpdated RCUK guidance for funding applications involving animal research 2015 [18 Nov 2019]. Available from: https://mrc.ukri.org/news/browse/updated-rcuk-guidance-for-funding-applications-involving-animal-research/. [cited 16 June 2020].
no DOI — not checkedbibr56-0271678X20943823
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0271678x20943823"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0271678x20943823/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0271678x20943823)