Reference health
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations
17/17 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/0272989X07304449
Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003
The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography
resolves10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00466.x
Agreement Between Scales in the Measurement of Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions
resolves10.1177/0272989X0102100105
General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples
resolves10.1177/0272989X9401400307
The Effect of Physicians' Explanations on Patients' Treatment Preferences
resolves10.1177/0272989X9301300108
Patients' and Physicians' Interpretations of Graphic Data Displays
resolves10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007482.x
Using survival curve comparisons to inform patient decision making
resolves10.1177/0272989X0202200108
Effect of Framing as Gain versus Loss on Understanding and Hypothetical Treatment Choices: Survival and Mortality Curves
resolves10.1001/jama.1996.03540140060028
The Role of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health and Medicine
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199902)8:1<25::AID-HEC398>3.0.CO;2-H
Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes
resolves10.1016/S0168-8510(97)00077-8
Value measurement in cost-utility analysis: explaining the discrepancy between rating scale and person trade-off elicitations
resolves10.1177/0272989X04263160
The Validity of Person Tradeoff Measurements: Randomized Trial of Computer Elicitation Versus Face-to-Face Interview
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSoftware
no DOI — not checkedatypb10
no DOI — not checkedatypb20
no DOI — not checkedatypb21
no DOI — not checkedCouper MP The promise and perils of Web surveys. In: Westlake A, Manners T, Rigg M, eds. The Challenge of the Internet . London: Association of Survey Computing; 2001. p ix-194.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0272989x07303824"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0272989x07303824/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0272989x07303824)