Reference health
Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS <sup>®</sup> -Preference (PROPr) Scoring System
37/37 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 37 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004
Multiattribute Utility Function for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System
resolves10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006
Multiattribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System
resolves10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
resolves10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
resolves10.1007/978-94-011-2988-6_3
The Quality of Well-being Scale: rationale for a single quality of life index
resolves10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.002
A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life in Visual Disorders
resolves10.1586/14737167.5.5.567
Comparing generic preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures: advancing the research agenda
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.010
Five preference-based indexes in cataract and heart failure patients were not equally responsive to change
resolves10.1177/0272989X17696999
An Approach to Reconciling Competing Ethical Principles in Aggregating Heterogeneous Health Preferences
resolves10.1287/opre.30.6.1043
Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Measure Social Preferences for Health States
resolves10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
resolves10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6
The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008
resolves10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04
Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks
resolves10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9374
NIH’s transformative opportunities for the behavioral and social sciences
resolves10.1007/s11136-017-1686-2
Selection of key health domains from PROMIS® for a generic preference-based scoring system
resolves10.1177/02729890122062622
Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States?
resolves10.1177/0272989X15581800
Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale
resolves10.1016/j.jval.2013.11.009
Specification of the Utility Function in Discrete Choice Experiments
resolves10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.043
Patient and general public preferences for health states: A call to reconsider current guidelines
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.020
A meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences between patient and population preferences
resolves10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.04.011
Valuations of epilepsy-specific health states: a comparison of patients with epilepsy and the general population
resolves10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587
Preference-Based Measures in Economic Evaluation in Health Care
resolves10.1017/S0266462303000321
COMPARING COMMUNITY-PREFERENCE–BASED AND DIRECT STANDARD GAMBLE UTILITY SCORES: EVIDENCE FROM ELECTIVE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
resolves10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00254-5
Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons
resolves10.1007/s11136-004-6189-2
Comparing Short Form 6D, Standard Gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: Results from total hip arthroplasty patients
resolves10.1097/00005650-200301000-00017
Patient and Community Preferences for Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
resolves10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00610.x
Health State Valuations of Patients and the General Public Analytically Compared: A Meta-Analytical Comparison of Patient and Population Health State Utilities
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199909)8:6<541::AID-HEC464>3.0.CO;2-8
A comparison of patient and social tariff values derived from the time trade-off method
resolves10.1001/jama.2016.12195
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses
resolves10.2165/11590480-000000000-00000
Ordering Errors, Objections and Invariance in Utility Survey Responses
resolves10.1177/0272989X09347016
Comparison of 5 Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes Using Item Response Theory Analysis
resolves10.1177/0272989X16650181
Underestimation of Variance of Predicted Health Utilities Derived from Multiattribute Utility Instruments
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedbibr6-0272989X18776637
no DOI — not checkedPaper prepared for the Workshop on Advancing Social Science Theory: The Importance of Common Metrics. National Academies
no DOI — not checkedTheory of Games and Economic Behaviour
no DOI — not checkedDecisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs
no DOI — not checkedItem Response Theory for Psychologists
no DOI — not checkedbibr22-0272989X18776637
no DOI — not checkedbibr25-0272989X18776637
no DOI — not checkedHanmer J, Dewitt B. PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) score construction—a technical report. 2017. Available from: janelhanmer.pitt.edu/PROPr.html
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of Mathematical Psychology
no DOI — not checkedThe Foundations of Statistics
no DOI — not checkedMathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction
no DOI — not checkedMultiplicative Multi-Attribute Utility Function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) System: A Technical Report
no DOI — not checkedPROMIS. Applied Cognition—Abilities. 2015. Available from: http://www.healthmeasures.net/administrator/components/com_instruments/uploads/PROMIS%20Short%20Form%20v2.0-Cognitive%20Abilities%20Subset%204a%2010-20-2016.pdf
no DOI — not checkedbibr32-0272989X18776637
no DOI — not checkedNonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0272989x18776637"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0272989x18776637/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/0272989x18776637)