Reference health

Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?

https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
CiteStamped reference-health badge
32/32 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-02

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

17 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 32 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/9780470773666
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
resolves10.2307/2343787
Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data
resolves10.1348/000712608X377117
Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported?
resolves10.1348/000711009X481027
Book Review
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.
resolves10.1214/ss/1056397485
Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing?
resolves10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00026
Confidence intervals permit, but don’t guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing
resolves10.1119/1.1990764
Probability, Frequency and Reasonable Expectation
resolves10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502008.x
Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them Think
resolves10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
Mindless statistics
resolves10.1613/jair.644
Cox's Theorem Revisited
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4
Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses
resolves10.1037/1082-989X.5.3.315
The proof of the pudding: An illustration of the relative strengths of null hypothesis, meta-analysis, and Bayesian analysis.
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511790423
Probability Theory
resolves10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
resolves10.1002/wcs.72
Bayesian data analysis
resolves10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.001
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis
resolves10.1177/1745691611406925
Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511621123
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226467030.001.0001
For and Against Method
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226511993.001.0001
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226789583.003.0004
An Error-Statistical Philosophy of Evidence
resolves10.1086/288135
Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01659.x
Doing Is for Thinking!
resolves10.3758/BF03196808
Detecting chance: A solution to the null sensitivity problem in subliminal priming
resolves10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
resolves10.7208/chicago/9780226789583.001.0001
The Nature of Scientific Evidence
resolves10.3758/BF03194105
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
resolves10.1093/biomet/84.2.419
A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment
resolves10.1177/1745691611406923
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01167.x
Ten Statisticians and Their Impacts for Psychologists
The 17 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBeyond analysis of variance
no DOI — not checkedbibr8-1745691611406920
no DOI — not checkedHandbook of the philosophy of statistics
no DOI — not checkedDienes Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Zoltan_Dienes/inference/
no DOI — not checkedAdvances in cognitive science: Learning, evolution and social action
no DOI — not checkedWhat if there were no significance tests?
no DOI — not checkedScientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach
no DOI — not checkedThe theory of probability
no DOI — not checkedbibr23-1745691611406920
no DOI — not checkedDoing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS
no DOI — not checkedCritical rationalism: A restatement and defence
no DOI — not checkedStatistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioural sciences
no DOI — not checkedConjectures and refutations
no DOI — not checkedStatistical evidence: A likelihood paradigm
no DOI — not checkedThe foundations of statistical inference: A discussion
no DOI — not checkedProbability, statistics and truth
no DOI — not checkedThe cult of statistical significance: How the standard error cost us jobs, justice and lives
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691611406920"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691611406920/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691611406920/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691611406920)