At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1038/nn1979Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism
resolves10.1177/2053168016688122Comment on Kahan and Corbin: Can polarization increase with actively open-minded thinking?
resolves10.1037/a0021524Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.
resolves10.1177/0002716214554756Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion
resolves10.1111/pops.12337The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks
resolves10.1111/pops.12304Are Conservatives Really More Simple‐Minded than Liberals? The Domain Specificity of Complex Thinking
resolves10.1111/pops.12470Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left‐Wing Authoritarianism in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.004The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right
resolves10.1017/S1930297500005131Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology
resolves10.1177/1745691617746796At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives
resolves10.1111/jcom.12105Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro- and Counterattitudinal News Consumption
resolves10.1016/j.intell.2010.12.001Cognitive ability, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation: A five-year longitudinal study amongst adolescents
resolves10.1017/S0022381607080139Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.
resolves10.1111/ajps.12234Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust
resolves10.1002/per.2027The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right–Wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta–Analytic Review
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3023545Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Analytic Thinking, Motivated Reasoning, Political Ideology, and Bullshit Receptivity
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0153419Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism
resolves10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
resolves10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.018Is ideology the enemy of inquiry? Examining the link between political orientation and lack of interest in novel data
resolves10.1111/ssqu.12138How Party Affiliation Conditions the Experience of Dissonance and Explains Polarization and Selective Exposure*
resolves10.1017/S1930297500005684The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe authoritarian personality
no DOI — not checkedRight-wing authoritarianism
no DOI — not checkedBendery J. (2017 December 5). Roy Moore is fueling a crazy conspiracy theory about George Soros. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/roy-moore-george-soros_us_5a26fb54e4b08220bd787c0d
no DOI — not checkedBenkler Y., Faris R., Roberts H., Zuckerman E. (2017, March 3). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 1(4.1), 7. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php
no DOI — not checkedThe party of fear: The American far right from nativism to the militia movement
no DOI — not checkedSocial psychology
no DOI — not checkedThe myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies
no DOI — not checkedDunning D. (2016, May 25). The psychological quirk that explains why you love Donald Trump. Politico.com. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/donald-trump-supporters-dunning-kruger-effect-213904
no DOI — not checkedCritical psychology: An introduction
no DOI — not checkedGoldberg M., Jost J. T. (2018). Ideological avoidance of belief-discrepant information. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, New York.
no DOI — not checkedHaidt J. (2011, February 11). The bright future of post-partisan social psychology. Edge. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/conversation/jonathan_haidt-the-bright-future-of-post-partisan-social-psychology
no DOI — not checkedThe paranoid style in American politics and other essays
no DOI — not checkedJost J. T. (2011). Commentary on J. Haidt’s “The bright future of post-partisan social psychology.” Edge. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/conversation/jonathan_haidt-the-bright-future-of-post-partisan-social-psychology#22212
no DOI — not checkedJost J. T., Hunyady O. (2018, Spring). Mass psychology in the age of Trump. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 48. Retrieved from https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/48/mass-psychology-in-the-age-of-trump
no DOI — not checkedAdvances in motivation science
no DOI — not checkedThe psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium
no DOI — not checkedThe motivation-cognition interface: From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski
no DOI — not checkedLeonhardt S., Thompson S. A. (2017, December 14). Trump’s lies. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com//interactive//2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html
no DOI — not checkedLipset S. M., Raab E. (1978). The politics of unreason: Right-wing extremism in America, 1790–1977 (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedMarwick A., Lewis R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf
no DOI — not checkedThe republican brain: The science of why they deny science—and reality
no DOI — not checkedNational Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2012, January 13). NASA finds 2012 sustained long-term climate warming trend (NASA Headquarters Release No. 13-021). Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-temps.html
no DOI — not checkedPerkins D., Bushey B., Faraday M. (1986). Learning to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/~baron/aot/perkins1986.pdf
no DOI — not checkedRobbins J. (2017, December 1). Brexit voters and Britain First supporters are more likely to believe conspiracy theories. International Business Times. Retrieved from https://amp.ibtimes.co.uk/brexit-voters-britain-first-supporters-are-more-likely-believe-conspiracy-theories-1649106
no DOI — not checkedVoeten E. (2012, June 6). Science, genetics, and polarization [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://themonkeycage.org/2012/06/science-genetics-and-polarization/
checked 2026-07-31 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.