Reference health

False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased?

https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618788876
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 76 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-31

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1017/S0140525X1400043
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.4324/9781315687988
Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe
resolves10.1038/nn1979
Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism
resolves10.1177/0956797615594620
Tweeting From Left to Right
resolves10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00731.x
Why Teach Thinking?‐An Essay
resolves10.1080/13546789508256909
Myside bias in thinking about abortion
resolves10.1177/2053168016688122
Comment on Kahan and Corbin: Can polarization increase with actively open-minded thinking?
resolves10.1016/0749-5978(88)90021-0
Heuristics and biases in diagnostic reasoning
resolves10.2307/j.ctvc77jxs
Unequal Democracy
resolves10.1037/a0021524
Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.
resolves10.1177/0002716214554756
Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion
resolves10.1111/pops.12337
The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks
resolves10.1177/0956797617693004
Predicting Ideological Prejudice
resolves10.1177/0963721413510932
The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis
resolves10.1017/S0022381609090914
Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion
resolves10.4159/9780674978461
Far-Right Politics in Europe
resolves10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.046
Scientific literacy, optimism about science and conservatism
resolves10.1177/0956797612447820
Ideology and Prejudice
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
resolves10.1111/pops.12304
Are Conservatives Really More Simple‐Minded than Liberals? The Domain Specificity of Complex Thinking
resolves10.1111/pops.12470
Finding the Loch Ness Monster: Left‐Wing Authoritarianism in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.004
The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
Political Intolerance, Right <i>and</i> Left
resolves10.1177/1745691614562005
Building a More Mobile America—One Income Quintile at a Time
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02036.x
Bright Children Become Enlightened Adults
resolves10.1017/S1930297500005131
Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology
resolves10.1177/1745691617746796
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives
resolves10.1017/S0140525X14001186
Political bias is tenacious
resolves10.1177/0963721417718261
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice
resolves10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01756.x
Resuscitating Critical Psychology for “Revolting” Times
resolves10.1177/0146167214538672
Political Conservatives’ Affinity for Obedience to Authority Is Loyal, Not Blind
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003
Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions
resolves10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate
resolves10.1111/jcom.12105
Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro- and Counterattitudinal News Consumption
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation
resolves10.1016/j.intell.2010.12.001
Cognitive ability, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation: A five-year longitudinal study amongst adolescents
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511802331
Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
resolves10.1177/0956797611421206
Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes
resolves10.1177/1745691612448792
Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology
resolves10.1017/S0022381607080139
Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership
resolves10.1037/a0035941
Belief polarization is not always irrational.
resolves10.1111/pops.12407
Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
resolves10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0041
“Hot” Political Cognition: Its Self-, Group-, and System-Serving Purposes
resolves10.1017/S1930297500005271
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
resolves10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0418
The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 2: Unanswered Questions
resolves10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
resolves10.1177/0149206317743553
Systematic Subjectivity: How Subtle Biases Infect the Scholarship Review Process
resolves10.1006/obhd.1993.1044
The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511791048
How Voters Decide
resolves10.1177/0963721416654436
Motivated Rejection of Science
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00680.x
Citizens' Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies
resolves10.4324/9780203080467
Varieties of Right-Wing Extremism in Europe
resolves10.1111/ajps.12234
Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511617201
Hearing the Other Side
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0059837
“Not for All the Tea in China!” Political Ideology and the Avoidance of Dissonance-Arousing Situations
resolves10.1002/per.2027
The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right–Wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice: A Meta–Analytic Review
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3023545
Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Analytic Thinking, Motivated Reasoning, Political Ideology, and Bullshit Receptivity
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0153419
Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism
resolves10.1007/978-1-4684-8163-1
Justice and the Critique of Pure Psychology
resolves10.1017/CBO9781139175043
Social Dominance
resolves10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
Individual differences in rational thought.
resolves10.1017/S1930297500003788
Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?
resolves10.2307/3790998
The Myth of Left-Wing Authoritarianism
resolves10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.018
Is ideology the enemy of inquiry? Examining the link between political orientation and lack of interest in novel data
resolves10.1126/science.aap9559
The spread of true and false news online
resolves10.1111/ssqu.12138
How Party Affiliation Conditions the Experience of Dissonance and Explains Polarization and Selective Exposure*
resolves10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60017-9
The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction
resolves10.1177/1948550613476096
Discrimination Across the Ideological Divide
resolves10.1126/science.1260817
Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness
resolves10.1017/S1930297500005684
The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used
resolves10.1073/pnas.1708960115
Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe authoritarian personality
no DOI — not checkedRight-wing authoritarianism
no DOI — not checkedBendery J. (2017 December 5). Roy Moore is fueling a crazy conspiracy theory about George Soros. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/roy-moore-george-soros_us_5a26fb54e4b08220bd787c0d
no DOI — not checkedBenkler Y., Faris R., Roberts H., Zuckerman E. (2017, March 3). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 1(4.1), 7. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php
no DOI — not checkedThe party of fear: The American far right from nativism to the militia movement
no DOI — not checkedSocial psychology
no DOI — not checkedThe myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies
no DOI — not checkedDunning D. (2016, May 25). The psychological quirk that explains why you love Donald Trump. Politico.com. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/donald-trump-supporters-dunning-kruger-effect-213904
no DOI — not checkedCritical psychology: An introduction
no DOI — not checkedGoldberg M., Jost J. T. (2018). Ideological avoidance of belief-discrepant information. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, New York.
no DOI — not checkedHaidt J. (2011, February 11). The bright future of post-partisan social psychology. Edge. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/conversation/jonathan_haidt-the-bright-future-of-post-partisan-social-psychology
no DOI — not checkedThe paranoid style in American politics and other essays
no DOI — not checkedJost J. T. (2011). Commentary on J. Haidt’s “The bright future of post-partisan social psychology.” Edge. Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/conversation/jonathan_haidt-the-bright-future-of-post-partisan-social-psychology#22212
no DOI — not checkedJost J. T., Hunyady O. (2018, Spring). Mass psychology in the age of Trump. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 48. Retrieved from https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/48/mass-psychology-in-the-age-of-trump
no DOI — not checkedAdvances in motivation science
no DOI — not checkedThe psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium
no DOI — not checkedThe motivation-cognition interface: From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski
no DOI — not checkedLeonhardt S., Thompson S. A. (2017, December 14). Trump’s lies. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com//interactive//2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html
no DOI — not checkedLipset S. M., Raab E. (1978). The politics of unreason: Right-wing extremism in America, 1790–1977 (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedMarwick A., Lewis R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/DataAndSociety_MediaManipulationAndDisinformationOnline.pdf
no DOI — not checkedThe republican brain: The science of why they deny science—and reality
no DOI — not checkedNational Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2012, January 13). NASA finds 2012 sustained long-term climate warming trend (NASA Headquarters Release No. 13-021). Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-temps.html
no DOI — not checkedPerkins D., Bushey B., Faraday M. (1986). Learning to reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/~baron/aot/perkins1986.pdf
no DOI — not checkedRobbins J. (2017, December 1). Brexit voters and Britain First supporters are more likely to believe conspiracy theories. International Business Times. Retrieved from https://amp.ibtimes.co.uk/brexit-voters-britain-first-supporters-are-more-likely-believe-conspiracy-theories-1649106
no DOI — not checkedVoeten E. (2012, June 6). Science, genetics, and polarization [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://themonkeycage.org/2012/06/science-genetics-and-polarization/
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-31 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691618788876"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691618788876/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691618788876/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/1745691618788876)