Reference health
Health Technologies for Monitoring and Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Review
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405
Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study
resolves10.1136/bmj.317.7160.703
Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38
resolves10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70190-3
Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
resolves10.1136/jech.52.6.377
The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
resolves10.1177/0145482X0910300404
Effectiveness of Assistive Technologies for Low Vision Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
resolves10.2337/diacare.20.9.1482
The Efficacy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in NIDDM subjects: A criteria-based literature review
resolves10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00390.x
Self‐monitoring in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis
resolves10.1136/bmj.39247.447431.BE
Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial
resolves10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.006
The effect of self monitoring of blood glucose concentrations on glycated hemoglobin levels in diabetic patients not taking insulin: A blinded, randomized trial
resolves10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70073-3
Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study
resolves10.2337/diacare.13.10.1044
Impact of Glucose Self-Monitoring on Non-lnsulin-Treated Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blood and Urine Testing
resolves10.1001/jama.286.10.1218
Effects of Exercise on Glycemic Control and Body Mass in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
resolves10.1007/BF00266036
Studies on the mechanism of improved glucose control during regular exercise in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes
resolves10.2337/diacare.18.6.775
Daily Walking Combined With Diet Therapy Is a Useful Means for Obese NIDDM Patients Not Only to Reduce Body Weight But Also to Improve Insulin Sensitivity
resolves10.1249/01.MSS.0000064996.63632.10
Comparison of Pedometer and Accelerometer Accuracy under Controlled Conditions
resolves10.1038/sj.ijo.0802485
Controlled outcome evaluation of the First Step Program: a daily physical activity intervention for individuals with type II diabetes
resolves10.1186/1479-5868-4-59
A randomized trial comparing structured and lifestyle goals in an internet-mediated walking program for people with type 2 diabetes
resolves10.2466/pms.100.1.61-68
Accelerometer Feedback to Promote Physical Activity in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
resolves10.1016/j.metabol.2007.12.002
Regular use of pedometer does not enhance beneficial outcomes in a physical activity intervention study in type 2 diabetes mellitus
resolves10.1016/j.metabol.2006.06.009
Efficacy of a pedometer-based physical activity program on parameters of diabetes control in type 2 diabetes mellitus
resolves10.1207/s15324796abm3003_3
Modifying physical activity in a multiethnic sample of low-income women: One-year results from the IMPACT (Increasing Motivation for Physical ACTivity) project
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00881.x
Evaluating the impact of mobile telephone technology on type 2 diabetic patients’ self‐management: the NICHE pilot study
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01698.x
A nurse short message service by cellular phone in type‐2 diabetic patients for six months
resolves10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.07.006
Effectiveness of mobile and internet intervention in patients with obese type 2 diabetes
resolves10.1016/j.diabres.2007.09.007
A short message service by cellular phone in type 2 diabetic patients for 12 months
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01506.x
Impact of web‐based nurse's education on glycosylated haemoglobin in type 2 diabetic patients
resolves10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01989.x
A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text‐messaging system to support young people with diabetes
resolves10.1016/j.diabet.2007.01.002
One-year efficacy and safety of Web-based follow-up using cellular phone in type 1 diabetic patients under insulin pump therapy: the PumpNet study
resolves10.1089/dia.2005.7.710
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Automated Wireless Messaging System for Diabetes
resolves10.1089/1520915041705893
The DAILY (Daily Automated Intensive Log for Youth) Trial: A Wireless, Portable System to Improve Adherence and Glycemic Control in Youth with Diabetes
resolves10.1089/dia.2008.0283
WellDoc
<sup>™</sup>
Mobile Diabetes Management Randomized Controlled Trial: Change in Clinical and Behavioral Outcomes and Patient and Physician Satisfaction
resolves10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00978-0
The effect of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
resolves10.1016/S1056-8727(01)00184-2
Risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in Type 2 diabetes
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Diabetes Statistics, 2007 fact sheet
no DOI — not checkedbibr3-193229680900300628
no DOI — not checkedbibr4-193229680900300628
no DOI — not checkedEvidence-based diabetes care
no DOI — not checkedbibr12-193229680900300628
no DOI — not checkedThe Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/. Accessed September 11, 2009.
no DOI — not checkedbibr16-193229680900300628
no DOI — not checkedCentre for Evidence Based Medicine http://www.cebm.net/?o=1023.
no DOI — not checkedTeasell R, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal SK, Jutai J, Speechley MR Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. London, Ontario Canada. See: http://www.ebrsr.com/. Accessed October 28, 2009.
no DOI — not checkedPoststroke Rehabilitation Guideline Panel
no DOI — not checkedbibr24-193229680900300628
no DOI — not checkedbibr27-193229680900300628
no DOI — not checkedbibr56-193229680900300628
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/193229680900300628"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/193229680900300628/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/193229680900300628)