Reference health
The Effect of Political Donation on Election Outcomes: Evidence from Taiwan Legislative Elections
29/29 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/106591290505800214
Good Money and Bad Money: Do Funding Sources Affect Electoral Outcomes?
resolves10.1177/106591290505800109
Reevaluating Spending in Gubernatorial Races: Job Approval as a Baseline for Spending Effects
resolves10.1177/1065912908325081
Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects in Proportional Electoral Systems
resolves10.1177/106591290505800415
The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Explaining Patterns of PAC Contributions to Candidates for Congress
resolves10.1017/S0003055407070311
Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress
resolves10.1177/1065912909333131
If You Can’t Join ’Em, Beat ’Em: The Gender Gap in Individual Donations to Congressional Candidates
resolves10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00150.x
<scp>Does Private Money Buy Public Policy? Campaign Contributions and Regulatory Outcomes in Telecommunications</scp>
resolves10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00266-8
The effects of campaign contribution sources on the congressional elections of 1996
resolves10.1111/1540-5907.00002
The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote
resolves10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.002
Incumbency advantage and candidate characteristics in open-list proportional representation systems: Evidence from Indonesia
resolves10.2307/2647913
Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach
resolves10.1016/j.strueco.2019.09.005
How money drives US congressional elections: Linear models of money and outcomes
resolves10.2307/2585672
Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00607.x
Consumption or Investment? On Motivations for Political Giving
resolves10.2307/2111450
The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments
resolves10.1111/ajps.12180
Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment
resolves10.1177/1536867X0400400206
Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00483.x
Campaign Contributions and U.S. Foreign Policy Outcomes: An Analysis of Cuban American Interests
resolves10.1086/708646
Does Campaign Spending Affect Election Outcomes? New Evidence from Transaction-Level Disbursement Data
resolves10.1016/j.electstud.2004.03.003
Money matters in party-centered politics: campaign spending in Korean congressional elections
resolves10.1086/261731
Campaign Contributions as Investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980-1986
resolves10.1017/S1468109918000129
Does candidate nomination in districts increase party votes of small parties? Evidence from the 2016 Taiwan legislative elections
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAllison B., Rojanasakul M., Harris B., Sam C. (2016). Tracking the 2016 presidential money race. Bloomberg. December 9, 2016. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-presidential-campaign-fundraising/.
no DOI — not checkedbibr11-21582440221084991
no DOI — not checkedFederal Election Commission. (2017, March 23). Statistical summary of 24-month campaign activity of the 2015-2016 election cycle. Author., Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.fec.gov/updates/statistical-summary-24-month-campaign-activity-2015-2016-election-cycle/.
no DOI — not checkedbibr21-21582440221084991
no DOI — not checkedLin L.S., Zhong L.H. (2016, July 19). Political donation in the presidential election: Tsai received the most money NT$ 740 million. Liberty Times Net. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/paper/1012280.
no DOI — not checkedScherer M., Rebala P., Wilson C. (2014, October 23). The incredible rise in campaign spending. TIME. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://time.com/3534117/the-incredible-rise-in-campaign-spending/.
no DOI — not checkedbibr32-21582440221084991
no DOI — not checkedbibr35-21582440221084991
no DOI — not checkedbibr37-21582440221084991
no DOI — not checkedbibr38-21582440221084991
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/21582440221084991"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/21582440221084991/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/21582440221084991)