Reference health
US–Iran Nuclear Deal: Cohorts and Challenger
not checkable · checked 2026-09-15
This work could not be checked — none of the deposited references carry a DOI. No claim is made either way about its reference list.
26 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 26 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAIPAC (2015, July 15). AIPAC statement on proposed Iranian nuclear agreement. Press Release. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.aipac.org/learn/resources/aipac-publications/publication?pubpath=PolicyPolitics/Press/AIPAC%20Statements/2015/07/AIPAC%20Statement%20on%20Proposed%20Iran%20Nuclear%20Agreement
no DOI — not checkedBBC News
(2015, September 5). Saudi king meets Obama amid concerns over Iran deal. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34153624
no DOI — not checkedBBC News
(2016, January 4). Saudi Arabia breaks off ties with Iran after al-Nimr execution. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35217328
no DOI — not checkedBlake, Eben (2015, May 8). Iran’s relationship with Assad, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthis in Yemen must stop, says Qatar’s foreign minister. IB Times. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.ibtimes.com/irans-relationship-assad-hezbollah-lebanon-houthis-yemen-must-stop-says-qatars-2039884
no DOI — not checkedBusiness Standard
(2015, December 30). US preparing new sanctions against Iran: Report. Retrieved December 30, 2015, from http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/us-preparing-new-sanctions-against-iran-report-115123100069_1.html
no DOI — not checkedCongressional Record (2015, September 10). Approval of joint comprehensive plan of action. House of Representatives, Vol. 161, No. 130. Retrieved December 30, 2015, from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2015/9/10/house-section/article/h5911-1
no DOI — not checkedDershowitz, Alan M. (2015, September 7). Hold Iran to the language in the deal. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/hold-iran-to-the-language-in-the-deal-1441666978
no DOI — not checkedDrezner, Daniel W. (2016, January 5). The diminished legacy of the Iran deal. The Washington Post. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/01/05/the-diminished-legacy-of-the-iran-deal/
no DOI — not checkedGreenberg, Joel (2015, September 3). Netanyahu to continue campaign against Iran nuclear deal. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/netanyahu-to-continue-campaign-against-iran-nuclear-deal-1441281409
no DOI — not checkedJ Street. (2015, September 4). Daily News Roundup. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://jstreet.org/blog/post/j-street-news-roundup-9415_1
no DOI — not checkedKant, Garth (2015, September 9). Trump storms Washington to stop Iran nuke deal. WND. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/trump-storms-washington-to-stop-iran-nuke-deal/
no DOI — not checkedKatzman, Kenneth, & Kerr, Paul K. (2015, December 15). Iran nuclear agreement. Congressional Research Service Report. Retrieved December 30, 2015, from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R43333.pdf
no DOI — not checkedKroenig, Matthew (2012, January–February). Time to attack Iran: Why a strike is a least bad option. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved December 30, 2015, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/middle-east/2012-01-01/time-attack-iran
no DOI — not checkedMarcus, Jonathan (2015, July 14). Iran nuclear agreement: A good deal for now? BBC News. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33524147
no DOI — not checkedMorris, Loveday, & Naylor, Hugh (2015, July 14). Arab states fear nuclear deal will give Iran a bigger regional role. The Washington Post. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/arab-states-fear-dangerous-iranian-nuclear-deal-will-shake-up-region/2015/07/14/96d68ff3-7fce-4bf5-9170-6bcc9dfe46aa_story.html
no DOI — not checkedMorrison, David (2009, June 28). The elephant in the room: Israel’s nuclear weapons. The Electronic Intifada. Retrieved January 25, 2013, from https://electronicintifada.net/content/elephant-room-israels-nuclear-weapons/8312
no DOI — not checkedPompeo, Mike, & Rivkin, David B., Jr. (2015, September 6). A side agreement could void the Iran Deal. The Washington Post. Retrieved from January 10, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-side-agreement-could-void-the-iran-deal/2015/09/06/f35ce8aa-532d-11e5-933e-7d06c647a395_story.html
no DOI — not checkedRestoring the balance: A Middle East strategy for the next president
no DOI — not checkedRiechmann, Deb (2015, July 28). Secretary of State John Kerry testifies about landmark nuclear agreement with Iran. PBS. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/secretary-state-john-kerry-testifies-landmark-nuclear-agreement-iran/
no DOI — not checkedRobbins, James (2015 July 4). Iran’s nuclear deal: The toughest of all challenges. BBC News. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-33365674
no DOI — not checkedSanger, David E. & Gordon, Michael R. (2015, August 23). Future risks of an Iran nuclear deal. The New York Times. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/24/world/middleeast/in-pushing-for-the-iran-nuclear-deal-obamas-rationale-shows-flaws.html
no DOI — not checkedUS Congress (2015a, May 22). Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, H.R. 1191–114th Congress (2015–16), Public Law No. 114–17. Retrieved January 16, 2016, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1191/text/pl
no DOI — not checkedUS Congress (2015b, July 30). A resolution expressing the determination of the Senate that the 60-calendar day period for congressional review of the nuclear agreement with Iran did not begin with the transmittal of the agreement on July 19, 2015, because that transmittal did not include all materials required to be transmitted pursuant to the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, S.Res. 238–114th Congress (2015–16). Retrieved January 16, 2016, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/238/text
no DOI — not checkedUS Department of State (2015a, July 14). Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Vienna. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/245317.pdf
no DOI — not checkedUS Department of State (2015b, September 2). Remarks on nuclear agreement with Iran. Retrieved from January 15, 2016, http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2015/09/246574.htm
no DOI — not checkedWilner, Michael (2015, September 11). US House of Representatives rejects resolution to approve Iran deal. The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran/US-House-of-Representatives-rejects-resolution-to-approve-Iran-deal-415973
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-15 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/2347798916632323"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/2347798916632323/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1177/2347798916632323)