Reference health
Development and validation of prediction model to estimate 10-year risk of all-cause mortality using modern statistical learning methods: a large population-based cohort study and external validation
47/47 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 47 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/jnci/91.18.1541
Validation Studies for Models Projecting the Risk of Invasive and Total Breast Cancer Incidence
resolves10.1136/bmj.c6624
Derivation, validation, and evaluation of a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: cohort study using QResearch database
resolves10.1001/jama.295.7.801
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index for 4-Year Mortality in Older Adults
resolves10.1001/jama.285.23.2987
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index for 1-Year Mortality in Older Adults After Hospitalization
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000430)19:8<1059::AID-SIM412>3.0.CO;2-0
Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets
resolves10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30177-X
Trends in life expectancy and age-specific mortality in England and Wales, 1970–2016, in comparison with a set of 22 high-income countries: an analysis of vital statistics data
resolves10.1136/bmj.b606
Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00009
Translating Clinical Research into Clinical Practice: Impact of Using Prediction Rules To Make Decisions
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0189134
Religion, a social determinant of mortality? A 10-year follow-up of the Health and Retirement Study
resolves10.1186/s41512-019-0056-7
Development and validation of a prediction model to estimate the risk of liver cirrhosis in primary care patients with abnormal liver blood test results: protocol for an electronic health record study in Clinical Practice Research Datalink
resolves10.1136/bmj.m441
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
resolves10.1111/1471-0528.13244
Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (<scp>TRIPOD</scp>): the <scp>TRIPOD</scp> statement
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597
MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/btg287
A Bayesian missing value estimation method for gene expression profile data
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970228)16:4<385::AID-SIM380>3.0.CO;2-3
THE LASSO METHOD FOR VARIABLE SELECTION IN THE COX MODEL
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-14-116
Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
resolves10.1001/jama.1997.03540300056034
Clinical Prediction Rules<subtitle>A Review and Suggested Modifications of Methodological Standards</subtitle>
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4
MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS
resolves10.1093/aje/kwj063
The Inconsistency of “Optimal” Cutpoints Obtained using Two Criteria based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
resolves10.1186/s12874-016-0239-7
Assessment of predictive performance in incomplete data by combining internal validation and multiple imputation
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-13-33
External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods
resolves10.1053/suro.2002.32490
Comparisons of nomograms and urologists' predictions in prostate cancer
resolves10.1186/s41512-019-0060-y
Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature
resolves10.1136/bmj.320.7236.659
Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice
resolves10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181a5a7c0
Purpose in Life Is Associated With Mortality Among Community-Dwelling Older Persons
resolves10.1097/00005650-199912000-00006
The Association Between Self-Rated Health and Mortality in a Well-Characterized Sample of Coronary Artery Disease Patients
resolves10.1136/bmj.i3140
External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0194085
Predicting urinary tract infections in the emergency department with machine learning
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-14-137
Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.009
Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred
resolves10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00114-3
Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project
resolves10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2133
Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models for People With Severe Mental Illness
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedKobayashi LC, et al. The development and validation of an index to predict 10-year mortality risk in a longitudinal cohort of older English adults. Age Ageing. 2017;46(3):427–32.
no DOI — not checkedFan J, Lv J. A selective overview of variable selection in high dimensional feature space. Stat Sin. 2010;20(1):101–48.
no DOI — not checkedHastie T, Tibshirani R, FJ. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Second Edition: Springer New York; 2009.
no DOI — not checkedDJH. Classifier technology and the illusion of Progress. Stat Sci. 2006;21(1):1–5.
no DOI — not checkedSteyerberg E. Clinical Prediction Models. A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. New York: Springer; 2009.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1186/s12874-020-01204-7"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1186/s12874-020-01204-7/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1186/s12874-020-01204-7)