Reference health
Analysis of full-text publication and publishing predictors of abstracts presented at an Italian public health meeting (2005–2007)
31/31 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-24
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 31 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1001/jama.1994.03520020069019
The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review
resolves10.1001/jama.1994.03520020063017
Effect of Institutional Prestige on Reviewers' Recommendations and Editorial Decisions
resolves10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170290046007
Improving Participation and Interrater Agreement in Scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association Abstracts
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0002052
An Analysis of the Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for Neuroscience from 2001 to 2006
resolves10.1080/17453670710013807
Reviewer agreement in scoring 419 abstracts for scientific orthopedics meetings
resolves10.1097/01.blo.0000127584.02606.00
Interrater Reliability in Grading Abstracts for the Orthopaedic Trauma Association
resolves10.1097/01.PRS.0000061092.88629.82
Reliability of a Structured Method of Selecting Abstracts for a Plastic Surgical Scientific Meeting
resolves10.1001/jama.290.4.495
Factors Associated With Failure to Publish Large Randomized Trials Presented at an Oncology Meeting
resolves10.1001/jama.280.3.254
Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting
resolves10.1001/jama.295.11.1281
Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials
resolves10.1097/01.bot.0000199120.45982.41
The Consistency Between Scientific Papers Presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and their Subsequent Full-Text Publication
resolves10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10879.x
Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full‐text journal articles
resolves10.1016/j.hlc.2008.02.005
The Publication Rate and Impact of Abstracts Presented at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (1999–2005)
resolves10.1093/eurheartj/ehs113
From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation
resolves10.2106/00004623-200204000-00017
AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF ORTHOPAEDIC ABSTRACTS AND SUBSEQUENT FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONS
resolves10.2106/00004623-200301000-00024
BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS
resolves10.1001/jama.1994.03520020084025
Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-3-12
More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-9-23
Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication?
resolves10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04905.x
Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association
resolves10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.029
Factors Associated With the Full Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association
resolves10.1016/S0016-5107(01)70398-7
Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGorman RL, Oderda GM. Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol. 1990;32(5):470–2.
no DOI — not checkedJuzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey J, Juzych L, Shin D. Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(5):1879–82.
no DOI — not checkedCastaldi S, Colombo A, D’Errico R, Bert F, Siliquini R and study group. Study for the quality assessment of abstracts presented to Italian public health national conferences: a 6 years survey. Ann Ig. 2013;25(5):377–87.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1186/s13104-015-1463-7"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1186/s13104-015-1463-7/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1186/s13104-015-1463-7)