Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Virtual, Digital and Hybrid Twins: A New Paradigm in Data-Based Engineering and Engineered Data
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDigital Twin—looking behind the buzzwords, April 2018 edition of benchmark magazine. https://www.nafems.org/publications/benchmark/archive/april-2018/. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checked[eBook] Forging the digital twin in discrete manufacturing: a vision for unity in the virtual and real worlds. https://www.lnsresearch.com/research-library/research-articles/ebook-forging-the-digital-twin-in-discrete-manufacturing-a-vision-for-unity-in-the-virtual-and-real-worlds. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedNewcastle’s ‘digital twin’ to help city plan for disasters. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/dec/30/newcastles-digital-twin-to-help-city-plan-for-disasters. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedThe Gemini Principles. Centre for Digital Built Britain. https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/Resources/ResoucePublications/TheGeminiPrinciples.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedStochastics Working Group. What is uncertainty quantification. NAFEMS publication. 2018. https://www.nafems.org/publications/resource_center/wt08/. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedFortier M. Stochastics and its role in robust design. NAFEMS publication. https://www.nafems.org/publications/browse_buy/browse_by_topic/education/r0107/. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedBIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM. 2008;100.
no DOI — not checkedBIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM. 2008;101.
no DOI — not checkedRasmussen K, et al. Best practice guide to uncertainty evaluation for computationally expensive models. 2015. http://www.mathmet.org/publications/guides/index.php#expensive. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedMetrology for the factory of the future. https://www.ptb.de/empir2018/met4fof/home/. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedCommunication and validation of smart data in IoT-networks. https://www.ptb.de/empir2018/smartcom/home/. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedWikipedia. Hype Cycle. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gartner_Hype_Cycle.svg. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
no DOI — not checkedWikimedia Commons, GNU free documentation license, version 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GNU_Free_Documentation_License,_version_1.2. Accessed 19 Feb 2020.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.