Reference health
Close-Kin Mark-Recapture
34/34 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 34 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01165.x
Incorporating Genotype Uncertainty into Mark–Recapture‐Type Models For Estimating Abundance Using DNA Samples
resolves10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00927.x
Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies
resolves10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225
Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model
resolves10.1534/genetics.105.048074
The Power of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Large-Scale Parentage Inference
resolves10.1111/biom.12241
Closed‐population capture–recapture modeling of samples drawn one at a time
resolves10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8
DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations
resolves10.1038/nrg3012
Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing
resolves10.1111/faf.12121
A scientific alternative to moratoria for rebuilding depleted international tuna stocks
resolves10.1007/s10592-010-0166-9
Sibship reconstruction for inferring mating systems, dispersal and effective population size in headwater brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations
resolves10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02717.x
Review of capture–recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling
resolves10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x
Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations
resolves10.1016/0040-5809(86)90006-7
The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction
resolves10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02887.x
Detecting populations in the ‘ambiguous’ zone: kinship‐based estimation of population structure at low genetic divergence
resolves10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01361.x
Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model
resolves10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02833.x
Detecting dyads of related individuals in large collections of DNA‐profiles by controlling the false discovery rate
resolves10.1534/genetics.112.148825
Identity by Descent: Variation in Meiosis, Across Genomes, and in Populations
resolves10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04175.x
A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes
resolves10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04865.x
Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedHuber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In <i>Proc. Fifth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. and Probability</i> (<i>Berkeley</i>, <i>Calif.</i>, 1965<i>/</i>66), <i>Vol. I</i>: <i>Statistics</i> 221–233. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.
no DOI — not checkedBravington, M., Grewe, P. and Davies, C. (2014). Fishery-independent estimate of spawning biomass of Southern Bluefin Tuna through identification of close-kin using genetic markers. FRDC Report 2007/034, CSIRO, Australia.
no DOI — not checkedCotterman, C. W. (1940). A calculus for statistico-genetics. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH.
no DOI — not checkedCrow, J. F. and Kimura, M. (1970). <i>An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory</i>. Harper & Row, London.
no DOI — not checkedWeir, B. S. (1996). <i>Genetic Data Analysis II</i>. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
no DOI — not checkedPollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C. and Hines, J. E. (1990). Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. <i>Wildlife Monographs</i> <b>107</b> 3–97.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1214/16-sts552"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1214/16-sts552/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1214/16-sts552)