Reference health

Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models

https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180426
CiteStamped reference-health badge
35/35 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-10

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

1 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 35 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/jel.53.2.285
Research on Teaching Economics to Undergraduates
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.010
Ability sorting and the returns to college major
resolves10.1257/aer.90.4.765
Mentoring and Diversity
resolves10.1257/jep.30.4.221
Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem
resolves10.1126/science.1212382
Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India
resolves10.1179/030801811X13013181961473
The role of gender in team collaboration and performance
resolves10.1093/ei/cbg014
The Economic Reward for Studying Economics
resolves10.1257/aer.100.2.348
Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial
resolves10.1093/qje/qju009
Gender, Competitiveness, and Career Choices *
resolves10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference
resolves10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap <sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.458
Television and Divorce: Evidence from Brazilian <i>Novelas</i>
resolves10.1073/pnas.1613117114
Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering
resolves10.1080/00220489709597939
The Underrepresentation of Women in Economics: A Study of Undergraduate Economics Students
resolves10.1111/jems.12051
Diversity, Social Goods Provision, and Performance in the Firm
resolves10.1080/00220485.2012.714306
Women and the Choice to Study Economics
resolves10.1093/restud/rdu030
Do Competitive Workplaces Deter Female Workers? A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment on Job Entry Decisions
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1120.1674
The Impact of Gender Diversity on the Performance of Business Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment
resolves10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1057
The Power of TV: Cable Television and Women's Status in India <sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1093/qje/qjw019
Field of Study, Earnings, and Self-Selection*
resolves10.1515/2156-6674.1006
A Score Based Approach to Wild Bootstrap Inference
resolves10.3368/jhr.54.2.0416.7838R1
The Effect of Same-Gender or Same-Race Role Models on Occupation Choice
resolves10.1257/app.4.4.1
Soap Operas and Fertility: Evidence from Brazil
resolves10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00260.x
“Someone Like Me can be Successful”: Do College Students Need Same-Gender Role Models?
resolves10.1111/kykl.12166
Gender and European Economic Policy: A Survey of the Views of European Economists on Contemporary Economic Policy
resolves10.1111/coep.12004
ARE DISAGREEMENTS AMONG MALE AND FEMALE ECONOMISTS MARGINAL AT BEST?: A SURVEY OF AEA MEMBERS AND THEIR VIEWS ON ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY
resolves10.1037/gpr0000059
The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals
resolves10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067
Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?
resolves10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.010
The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics
resolves10.1111/ecoj.12350
Preferences and Biases in Educational Choices and Labour Market Expectations: Shrinking the Black Box of Gender
resolves10.1177/1536867X19830877
Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest
resolves10.1257/pandp.20181102
Representations of Men and Women in Introductory Economics Textbooks
resolves10.1037/a0021385
STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
resolves10.1093/restud/rdu044
Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification using an Information Experiment
resolves10.1093/qje/qjx035
Preference for the Workplace, Investment in Human Capital, and Gender*
The 1 reference without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedp_42
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1257/app.20180426"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1257/app.20180426/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1257/app.20180426/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1257/app.20180426)