1 of 24 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-22
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.3852/mycologia.99.2.175
Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and
<scp>ITS</scp>
2 from ribosomal
<scp>ITS</scp>
sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data
Opportunistic, human-pathogenic species in the Herpotrichiellaceae are phenotypically similar to saprobic or phytopathogenic species in the Venturiaceae
Molecular data place the hyphomycetous lichenicolous genus Sclerococcum close to Dactylospora (Eurotiomycetes) and S. parmeliae in Cladophialophora (Chaetothyriales)
Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data
AMPLIFICATION AND DIRECT SEQUENCING OF FUNGAL RIBOSOMAL RNA GENES FOR PHYLOGENETICS
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checked4. Borelli, D. 1983. <i>Taeniolella boppii</i>, a new species, causative agent of chromomycosis. Med Cut ILA. 11:227-232.
no DOI — not checked13. Ho, M.H.M., R.F. Castañeda-Ruiz, F.M. Dugan, and S.C. Jong. 1999. <i>Cladosporium</i> and <i>Cladophialophora</i> in culture: Descriptions and an expanded key. Mycotaxon. 72:115-157.
no DOI — not checked23. Tanabe, A.S. 2008. Phylogears version 2.0.2013.10.22. software distributed by the author at http://www.fifthdimension.jp/.
no DOI — not checked25. Trejos, A. 1954. <i>Cladosporium carrionii</i> n. sp. and the problem of <i>Cladosporia</i> isolated from chromoblastomycosis. Revista de Biologia Tropical. 2:75-112.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.