Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a publisher retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 68 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.future.2017.01.012Scientific workflows for computational reproducibility in the life sciences: Status, challenges and opportunities
resolves10.1890/120375Completing the data life cycle: using information management in macrosystems ecology research
resolves10.3233/ISU-170824Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud
resolves10.5334/jors.axData Management Lifecycle and Software Lifecycle Management in the Context of Conducting Science
resolves10.1890/ES12-00139.1The fractured lab notebook: undergraduates and ecological data management training in the United States
resolves10.1093/bib/bbx071Establishing a distributed national research infrastructure providing bioinformatics support to life science researchers in Australia
resolves10.1093/nar/gkv1352The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2016: Data growth and integration
resolves10.1093/nar/gkw1071Database Resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information
resolves10.1093/nar/gkv1310The SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics’ resources: focus on curated databases
resolves10.1186/s12915-016-0276-zModel organism databases: essential resources that need the support of both funders and users
resolves10.1002/pmic.201600034Strategies to improve usability and preserve accuracy in biological sequence databases
resolves10.1093/database/baw075BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences
resolves10.1093/nar/gkp1137The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants
resolves10.1038/nbt.1411Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project
resolves10.7717/peerj.1168Non-repeatable science: assessing the frequency of voucher specimen deposition reveals that most arthropod research cannot be verified
resolves10.3897/zookeys.150.2193Scratchpads 2.0: a Virtual Research Environment supporting scholarly collaboration, communication and data publication in biodiversity science
resolves10.1140/epjds13Realities of data sharing using the genome wars as case study - an historical perspective and commentary
resolves10.1038/nrg3305Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility
resolves10.7554/eLife.04333An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
resolves10.1056/NEJMp1211410For the Sake of Inquiry and Knowledge — The Inevitability of Open Access
resolves10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedLarge-scale data sharing in the life sciences: Data standards, incentives, barriers and funding models
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring the value of information: an asset valuation approach
no DOI — not checkedThe value and impact of the European Bioinformatics Institute: executive summary
no DOI — not checkedA reproducible R notebook using Docker
no DOI — not checkedWhy traditional storage systems don’t help us save stuff forever
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.