Reference health
Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review
1 of 67 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-14
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a publisher retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
38 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1045/june2004-harnad
The 66 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1186/1741-7015-10-73
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact
resolves10.1087/095315104322958526
Open access publishing models: opportunity or threat to scholarly and academic publishers?
resolves10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1047>3.0.CO;2-T
Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication
resolves10.12688/f1000research.8460.3
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review
resolves10.1006/ijhc.1995.1004
Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals
resolves10.7717/peerj.4375
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
resolves10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2
Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009
resolves10.17605/OSF.IO/K54UV
Evidence of Open Access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis
resolves10.1186/1741-7015-10-124
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure
resolves10.3233/ISU-140742
Attitudes towards open access: A meta-synthesis of the empirical literature
resolves10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1
Open access levels: a quantitative exploration using Web of Science and oaDOI data
resolves10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82
Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors
resolves10.1111/hir.12094
Open access behaviours and perceptions of health sciences faculty and roles of information professionals
resolves10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00852.x
The open access movement and Cuban health research work: an author survey
resolves10.1136/bmj.38705.490961.55
Importance of free access to research articles on decision to submit to the
<i>BMJ</i>
: survey of authors
resolves10.1002/asi.23742
A “Gold‐centric” implementation of open access: Hybrid journals, the “Total cost of publication,” and policy development in the UK and beyond
resolves10.1002/asi.23710
Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals
resolves10.1080/13614533.2010.518851
Authors’ Awareness and Attitudes Toward Open Access Repositories
resolves10.7717/peerj.2323
A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany
resolves10.7717/peerj.2264
Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada
resolves10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5
Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields
resolves10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013
Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences
resolves10.1002/leap.1113
Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciences
resolves10.7710/2162-3309.1133
Addressing Faculty Publishing Concerns with Open Access Journal Quality Indicators
resolves10.5281/zenodo.815932
A Landscape Study On Open Access And Monographs: Policies, Funding And Publishing In Eight European Countries
resolves10.5281/zenodo.31234
Open Science in der Soziologie: Eine interdisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme zur offenen Wissenschaft und eine Untersuchung ihrer Verbreitung in der Soziologie
resolves10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008
Researchers' green open access practice: a cross‐disciplinary analysis
resolves10.1093/reseval/rvw013
Humanities and social sciences in the bibliometric spotlight – Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility
resolves10.3998/3336451.0019.103
The Costs of Publishing Monographs: Toward a Transparent Methodology
resolves10.1629/uksg.392
Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework
resolves10.1080/13555502.2013.865981
Open Access for the Humanities: Not for Funders, Scientists or Publishers
resolves10.21257/sg.28
Freier Zugang zur juristischen Fachliteratur im Spiegel der Open-Science-Bewegung
resolves10.1017/S0731126500002444
Applying the Access Principle in Law: The Responsibilities of the Legal Scholar
<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1087/20150413
Open access — the rise and fall of a community‐driven model of scientific communication
resolves10.1002/leap.1114
Open access publications in sciences and social sciences: A comparative analysis
resolves10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.008
Publishing in Discipline-Specific Open Access Journals: Opportunities and Outreach for Librarians
The 38 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGreen and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline.
no DOI — not checkedProportion of Open Access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world levels: 1996-2013
no DOI — not checkedRead the budapest open access initiative
no DOI — not checkedOpen access availability of scientific publications.
no DOI — not checkedHow Open Is It? A Guide for Evaluating the Openness of Journals.
no DOI — not checked‘bronze’ open access supersedes green and gold.
no DOI — not checkedTen-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact.
no DOI — not checkedContext Matters. A Social Informatics Perspective on the Design and Implications of Large-Scale e-Government Systems
no DOI — not checkedTaylor & Francis Open Access Survey June 2014
no DOI — not checkedTowards a competitive and sustainable open access publishing market in europe.
no DOI — not checkedOpen access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.
no DOI — not checkedNIH Public Access Policy Details | publicaccess.nih.gov
no DOI — not checkedWho policy on open access
no DOI — not checkedOpen access policy
no DOI — not checkedOpen Access to Scientific Information: Chemistry.
no DOI — not checkedOpen-Access and long-form (book) publishing in the 2027 REF exercise: A briefing note for UK-based historians.
no DOI — not checkedOpen Access to Scientific Information: Engineering.
no DOI — not checkedOpen Access to Scientific Information: Physics.
no DOI — not checkedOpen Access Policy for CERN Publications.
no DOI — not checkedPublishing in open access journals in the social sciences and humanities: who’s doing it and why.
no DOI — not checkedIs Freemium Really Open Access
no DOI — not checkedDirectory of Open Access Repositories - OpenDOAR Statistics.
no DOI — not checkedOA policy of the SNSF: What’s new? – Open Access.
no DOI — not checkedPreface
no DOI — not checkedWhy open access makes no sense.
no DOI — not checkedDigital monographs in the humanities and social sciences: Report on user needs.
no DOI — not checkedOpen access journals in the Humanities and Social Science. A British Academy Research Project.
no DOI — not checkedGuidance on the implementation of plans.
no DOI — not checkedThe Movement for Open Access Law.
no DOI — not checkedHighlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing.
no DOI — not checkedDer freie Zugang zu wissenschaftlicher Information.
no DOI — not checkedDownload It While It’s Hot: Open Access and Legal Scholarship.
no DOI — not checkedWalled Gardens.
no DOI — not checkedThe Durham Statement Two Years Later: Open Access in the Law School Journal Environment.
no DOI — not checkedJournals and Publications
no DOI — not checkedDas Verhältnis zwischen Urheberrecht und Wissenschaft.
no DOI — not checkedNational Open Access Policy Guidelines with an Open Access Policy Model.
no DOI — not checkedDurham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2)