Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 75 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.008Measuring the carbon footprint of plastic surgery: A preliminary experience in a Chilean teaching hospital
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.076Sustainable healthcare and environmental life-cycle impacts of disposable supplies: a focus on disposable custom packs
resolves10.3386/w27599Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits
resolves10.1111/jiec.12921Potential for industrial ecology to support healthcare sustainability: Scoping review of a fragmented literature and conceptual framework for future research
resolves10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues
resolves10.1089/end.2018.0001Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes
resolves10.17605/OSF.IO/HDTXSOperating in a climate crisis: A systematic review protocol of lifecycle assessment within surgical services
resolves10.1371/journal.pmed.1002623Life cycle environmental emissions and health damages from the Canadian healthcare system: An economic-environmental-epidemiological analysis
resolves10.1065/lca2006.02.002The New International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044
resolves10.1177/0734242X12450602Impact on carbon footprint: a life cycle assessment of disposable versus reusable sharps containers in a large US hospital
resolves10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps
resolves10.1142/S1464333200000497THE USE OF LCA TO INTRODUCE LIFE-CYCLE THINKING INTO DECISION-MAKING FOR THE PURCHASE OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE NHS
resolves10.1007/s00170-020-06367-7Environmental impacts of conventional and additive manufacturing for the production of Ti-6Al-4V knee implant: a life cycle approach
resolves10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems
resolves10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013302The Environmental footprint of morphine: a life cycle assessment from opium poppy farming to the packaged drug
resolves10.1093/bja/aex098Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment
resolves10.7717/peerj.6204The impact on life cycle carbon footprint of converting from disposable to reusable sharps containers in a large US hospital geographically distant from manufacturing and processing facilities
resolves10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05473Cradle-to-Gate Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Twenty Anesthetic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Based on Process Scale-Up and Process Design Calculations
resolves10.1089/end.2012.0298Environmental Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States: An Estimate of the Carbon Dioxide Footprint
resolves10.1177/01410768211001583Environmental impact of personal protective equipment distributed for use by health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic
resolves10.3390/su122410245Cotton and Surgical Masks—What Ecological Factors Are Relevant for Their Sustainability?
resolves10.1213/ANE.0000000000002683Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.006Development and environmental improvements of plastics for hydrophilic catheters in medical care: an environmental evaluation
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104805Utilizing off-the-shelf LCA methods to develop a ‘triple bottom line’ auditing tool for global cataract surgical services
resolves10.1021/es504719gEnvironmental Impacts of Surgical Procedures: Life Cycle Assessment of Hysterectomy in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.017Cataract surgery and environmental sustainability: Waste and lifecycle assessment of phacoemulsification at a private healthcare facility
resolves10.1177/1355819617705683Do single-use medical devices containing biopolymers reduce the environmental impacts of surgical procedures compared with their plastic equivalents?
resolves10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.144Assessing the environmental, human health, and economic impacts of reprocessed medical devices in a Phoenix hospital's supply chain
resolves10.1002/aorn.12885An Environmental Analysis of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Gowns
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate
resolves10.1002/rcs.1640Carbon footprint of robotically‐assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkede_1_3_2_2_1
no DOI — not checkedCarre A. 2008. Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Laundered Surgical Gowns with Polypropylene Based Disposable Gowns. Melbourne Australia: RMIT University p. 84. https://www.lac-mac.com/mediafiles/catalogue/RMIT_LifeCycleAssessmentDisposableVsReusableGowns.pdf [accessed 25 July 2020].
no DOI — not checkedKarliner J Slotterback S Boyd R Ashby B Steele K. 2019. Health Care’s Climate Footprint: How the Health Sector Contributes to the Global Climate Crisis and Opportunities for Action. Brussels Belgium: Health Care Without Harm p. 48. https://noharm-global.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/5961/HealthCaresClimateFootprint_092319.pdf [accessed 23 June 2020].
no DOI — not checkedLiang G. 2019. Life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airway in Skånevård Sund (Lund University). http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8986326 [accessed 24 July 2020].
no DOI — not checkedMikusinska M. 2012. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Surgical Scrub Suits: the Case of Reusable and Disposable Scrubs used in Swedish Healthcare. Stockholm Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:574013/FULLTEXT01.pdf [accessed 25 July 2020].
no DOI — not checkedUnited Nations Environment Programme. 2019. Emissions Gap Report 2019. New York NY: United Nations Environment Programme p. 108. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/30797/EGR2019.pdf [accessed 4 August 2020].
no DOI — not checkedUnited Nations General Assembly. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Division for Sustainable Development Goals, United Nations, p. 35. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf, [accessed 5 November 2020].
no DOI — not checkedVan den Berghe AJ Zimmer C. 2011. Life Cycle Assessments Of Single- Versus Multiple-Use Surgical Gowns. Minneapolis MN: Minnesota Technical Assistance Program University of Minnesota. http://www.sustainabilityroadmap.org/pims/pdfs/pim247_lifecycle_assessment_disposable_versus_reusable.pdf [accessed 10 June 2020].
no DOI — not checkedVozzola E Overcash M Griffing E. 2018. Life Cycle Assessment of Surgical Drapes and Tapes: Reusable and Disposable. Environmental Clarity p. 111. Environmental Clarity Inc. Reston VA. Contact mrovercash@earthlink.net [accessed 25 July 2020].
no DOI — not checkedWeidema BP. 1997. Guidelines for Critical Review of Product LCA. https://lca-net.com/files/critical_review.pdf [accessed 23 June 2020].
no DOI — not checkedWorld Health Organization. 2020. WHO Guidance for Climate Resilient and Environmentally Sustainable Health Care Facilities. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization p. 79. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/335909 [accessed 27 October 2020].
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.