Reference health
Performance Measures for Electronic Journals
not checkable · checked 2026-07-25
This work could not be checked — none of the deposited references carry a DOI. No claim is made either way about its reference list.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedIssues in Science and Technology Librarianship
no DOI — not checkedCIT0002
no DOI — not checkedFranck, Carol and Chambers, Holly. “How Full Is the Full in Full-Text?”. Poster session presented at the ALA annual conference. Washington, DC. June. Available at <http://www2.potsdam.edu/LIBR/franckcr/ALA.html>
no DOI — not checkedLenares, Deborah. “Faculty Use of Electronic Journals at Research Institutions”. Association of College and Research Libraries 9th National Conference. Detroit, MI. April. pp.329–334.
no DOI — not checkedISTL (Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship)
no DOI — not checkedISTL (Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship)
no DOI — not checkedRevelle, Jack B., Moran, John W. and Cox Charles, A. 1998.The QFD Handbook, 410New York: John Wiley & Sons. plus disk. See Appendix D, pages 359–365.
no DOI — not checkedDiffusion of Innovations,
no DOI — not checkedShaffer, Shelley, Berteaux, Susan S., Oswald, Brandon and Breuggeman, Peter. “Going Electronic? Receipt of Print Journal Issues and Their Electronic Availability”. Proceedings of the 25th International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers Annual Conference. Woods Hole, MA. October. In press
no DOI — not checkedVon Dran, Gisela and Zhang, Ping. “A Model for Assessing the Quality of Websites”. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. pp.326–333. v. 37
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1300/j122v20n02_06"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1300/j122v20n02_06/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1300/j122v20n02_06)