Reference health
Computing Workflows for Biologists: A Roadmap
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-14
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a publisher retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000589
A Quick Guide for Developing Effective Bioinformatics Programming Skills
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0027310
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies
resolves10.1186/1471-2105-15-S14-S7
Community-driven development for computational biology at Sprints, Hackathons and Codefests
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMetabolomics
no DOI — not checkedEMBL Australia. BRAEMBL community survey report– 2013. 2013. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://braembl.org.au/news/braembl-community-survey-report-2013" xlink:type="simple">http://braembl.org.au/news/braembl-community-survey-report-2013</ext-link>
no DOI — not checkedBrown CT, Scott C, Crusoe MR. Comparing and evaluating assembly with graph alignment. In: Living In an Ivory Basement. 2015. Cited 19 Aug 2015. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2015-wok-evaluate.html" xlink:type="simple">http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2015-wok-evaluate.html</ext-link>
no DOI — not checkedGentzkow M, Shapiro JM. Code and Data for the Social Sciences : A Practitioner’s Guide. 2014; <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://people.stanford.edu/gentzkow/sites/default/files/codeanddata.xhtml" xlink:type="simple">https://people.stanford.edu/gentzkow/sites/default/files/codeanddata.xhtml</ext-link>
no DOI — not checkedPetre M, Wilson G. Code Review For and By Scientists. arXiv Prepr arXiv14075648. 2014; 4. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648" xlink:type="simple">http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648</ext-link>
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002303"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002303/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002303)