Reference health

Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075
CiteStamped reference-health badge
17/17 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-01

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1038/546025a
Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation
resolves10.11646/zootaxa.4317.1.10
What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017)
resolves10.1038/548158d
Taxonomy: stable taxon boundaries
resolves10.1038/547162d
Taxonomy: refine rather than stabilize
resolves10.1038/546600a
Taxonomy: avoid extra bureaucracy
resolves10.1038/546600b
Taxonomy: retain scientific autonomy
resolves10.1038/546599c
Taxonomy: naming algae, fungi, plants
resolves10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.014
Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation
resolves10.1038/419337a
Tension arises from duality at the heart of taxonomy
resolves10.1093/sysbio/syu069
Declining Rates of Species Described per Taxonomist: Slowdown of Progress or a Side-effect of Improved Quality in Taxonomy?
resolves10.1080/10635150701701083
Species Concepts and Species Delimitation
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.019
The impact of taxonomic change on conservation: Does it kill, can it save, or is it just irrelevant?
resolves10.1017/S0959270900003063
Conservation and species lists: taxonomic neglect promotes the extinction of endemic birds, as exemplified by taxa from eastern Atlantic islands
resolves10.1038/495314e
Outdated taxonomy blocks conservation
resolves10.1126/science.1237381
Response to Comments on “Can We Name Earth’s Species Before They Go Extinct?”
resolves10.3897/rio.2.e10610
Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal
resolves10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0059:TLSAIY]2.0.CO;2
The Linnaean System and Its 250-Year Persistence
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedTaxonomy is not beholden to its dependencies: a rebuttal to Garnett and Christidis (2017)
no DOI — not checkedManagement implications of poor alpha taxonomy
no DOI — not checkedNumbers of living species in Australia and the World
no DOI — not checkedBest practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review
no DOI — not checkedComment on <italic>Spracklandus</italic> Hoser, 2009 (Reptilia, Serpentes, ELAPIDAE): request for confirmation of availability of the generic name and for the nomenclatural validation of the journal in which it was published
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedSpecies concepts and phylogenetic theory: a debate
no DOI — not checkedHistorical development, theoretical foundations and practical relevance
no DOI — not checkedSpecies recovery in the United States: increasing the effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act
no DOI — not checkedImpacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation of African ungulate diversity: an overview
no DOI — not checkedCITES. Standard nomenclature. Resolution Conf. 12.11 (Rev. CoP17). [Cited 11 May 2017]. Available from: <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cites.org/eng/res/12/12-11R17.php" xlink:type="simple">https://cites.org/eng/res/12/12-11R17.php</ext-link>.
no DOI — not checkedRevision of the status of bird species occurring or reported in Colombia 2015, with discussion of BirdLife International’s new taxonomy
no DOI — not checkedHeterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-01 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005075)