Reference health
Similarity search for scientific workflows
3 of 29 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-14
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a publisher retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5555/3093139.3093147
does not resolve to a known work10.5555/832308.837142
does not resolve to a known work10.5555/3093139.3093145
The 26 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.artint.2009.12.002
Automated composition of Web services via planning in asynchronous domains
resolves10.1007/978-3-642-27392-6_8
Athena: Text Mining Based Discovery of Scientific Workflows in Disperse Repositories
resolves10.1016/j.future.2008.06.012
Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities
resolves10.1109/ICWS.2006.147
Workflow discovery: the problem, a case study from e-Science and a graph-based solution
resolves10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86
Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences
resolves10.1016/0166-218X(93)90090-B
Efficient labelling algorithms for the maximum noncrossing matching problem
resolves10.1093/bioinformatics/bth361
Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows
resolves10.1016/j.future.2008.06.010
The design and realisation of the Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows
resolves10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.48
Analysing Scientific Workflows: Why Workflows Not Only Connect Web Services
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedProvBench initiative. https://sites.google.com/site/provbench/. ProvBench initiative. https://sites.google.com/site/provbench/.
no DOI — not checkedSHIWA workflow repository. http://shiwa-repo.cpc.wmin.ac.uk. SHIWA workflow repository. http://shiwa-repo.cpc.wmin.ac.uk.
no DOI — not checkedS. Cohen-Boulakia , A. Denise , and S. Hamel . Using medians to generate consensus rankings for biological data . SSDBM , pages 73 -- 90 , 2011 . S. Cohen-Boulakia, A. Denise, and S. Hamel. Using medians to generate consensus rankings for biological data. SSDBM, pages 73--90, 2011.
no DOI — not checkedM. Dumas , L. García-Bañuelos , and R. Dijkman . Similarity search of business process models . Data Engineering Bull. , 32 ( 3 ): 23 -- 28 , 2009 . M. Dumas, L. García-Bañuelos, and R. Dijkman. Similarity search of business process models. Data Engineering Bull., 32(3): 23--28, 2009.
no DOI — not checkedN. Friesen and S. Rüping . Workflow analysis using graph kernels . SoKD , 2010 . N. Friesen and S. Rüping. Workflow analysis using graph kernels. SoKD, 2010.
no DOI — not checkedV. I. Levenshtein . Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet physics doklady, 10: 707 , 1966 . V. I. Levenshtein. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet physics doklady, 10: 707, 1966.
no DOI — not checkedR. Likert . A technique for the measurement of attitudes . Archives of Psychology , 1932 . R. Likert. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 1932.
no DOI — not checkedR. Maclin and D. Opitz . Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. arXiv:1106.0257 preprint , 2011 . R. Maclin and D. Opitz. Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. arXiv:1106.0257 preprint, 2011.
no DOI — not checkedP. Mates , E. Santos , J. Freire , and C. Silva . Crowdlabs: Social analysis and visualization for the sciences . SSDBM , pages 555 -- 564 , 2011 . P. Mates, E. Santos, J. Freire, and C. Silva. Crowdlabs: Social analysis and visualization for the sciences. SSDBM, pages 555--564, 2011.
no DOI — not checkedX. Xiang and G. Madey . Improving the reuse of scientific workflows and their by-products . ICWS , pages 792 -- 799 , 2007 . X. Xiang and G. Madey. Improving the reuse of scientific workflows and their by-products. ICWS, pages 792--799, 2007.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.14778/2732977.2732988"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.14778/2732977.2732988/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.14778/2732977.2732988)