Reference health

A Note on the Interdependence between Hypothesis Generation and Information Search in Conducting Analytical Procedures*

https://doi.org/10.1506/7kbw-bkcu-ttar-164l
CiteStamped reference-health badge
19/19 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

18 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1506/F1EG-9EJG-DJ0B-JD32
The Effect of Accountability and Time Budgets on Auditors' Testing Strategies*
resolves10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00022-6
Hypothesis revision strategies in conducting analytical procedures
resolves10.2307/2490443
Cognitive Changes Induced by Accounting Changes: Experimental Evidence on the Functional Fixation Hypothesis
resolves10.2307/2491397
The Impact of Hypothesis Set Size on the Time Efficiency and Accuracy of Analytical Review Judgments
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00827.x
An examination of the effect that commitment to a hypothesis has on auditors' evaluations of confirming and disconfirming evidence*
resolves10.2308/accr.1999.74.3.299
The Influence of Client Preferences on Tax Professionals' Search for Judicial Precedents, Subsequent Judgments and Recommendations
resolves10.4159/harvard.9780674189089
Medical Problem Solving
resolves10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.330
Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation.
resolves10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.27
Analytical Procedures and Audit-Planning Decisions
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00465.x
The Impact of an Auditor's Initial Hypothesis on Subsequent Performance at Identifying Actual Errors*
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00511.x
Audit Analytical Procedures: A Field Investigation*
resolves10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.649
Availability and interference in predictive judgment.
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(95)00002-Q
The impact of the review process in hypothesis generation tasks
resolves10.2307/2490831
Availability and the Generation of Hypotheses in Analytical Review
resolves10.2307/2491154
Experience and the Ability to Explain Audit Findings
resolves10.2307/2491150
The Effects of Time Pressure and Audit Program Structure on Audit Performance
resolves10.1016/0001-6918(81)90024-X
The availability explanation of excessive plausibility assessments
resolves10.2308/aud.1999.18.1.55
Are Audit Program Plans Risk-Adjusted?
resolves10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.176
Audit Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers
The 18 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedStatement on Auditing Standards No. 56: Analytical procedures
no DOI — not checkedAudit Guide Analytical Procedures
no DOI — not checkedAsare S. K. andA.Wright.1994.The effect of hypothesis generation and information search on performance in conducting analytical procedures. Unpublished manuscript University of Florida.
no DOI — not checkedPattern recognition, hypothesis generation and auditor performance in an analytical task
no DOI — not checkedThe effects of hypothesis quality, client management explanations, and industry experience on audit planning decisions
no DOI — not checkedAuditing organizations through a strategic‐systems lens
no DOI — not checkedThe expectations of accounting errors in medium sized manufacturing firms
no DOI — not checkedIncidence and circumstances of accounting errors
no DOI — not checkedProfessional Judgment: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making
no DOI — not checkedAuditors representation and retrieval of internal control knowledge
no DOI — not checkedAuditors' assessments of the likelihood of error explanations in analytical review
no DOI — not checkedA perspective on cognitive research in accounting
no DOI — not checkedProceedings of the 1990 Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems
no DOI — not checkedA cognitive characterization of audit analytical review
no DOI — not checkedAn exploratory study of auditor evidential planning judgments
no DOI — not checkedHuman problem solving
no DOI — not checkedPublic Oversight Board (POB).2000.The Panel on Audit Effectiveness Report and Recommendations(available online athttp:www.pobauditpanel.org).
no DOI — not checkedSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC).1990. In the matter of William G. Gaede Jr. CPA and Jon C. Richards CPA. Release no. AAER‐274.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1506/7kbw-bkcu-ttar-164l"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1506/7kbw-bkcu-ttar-164l/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1506/7kbw-bkcu-ttar-164l/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1506/7kbw-bkcu-ttar-164l)