Reference health
Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer
90/90 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
32 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 90 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00112-2
Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome
resolves10.1080/09537329308524138
Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations: a review
resolves10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z
Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development
resolves10.1023/A:1007828026904
Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory
resolves10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00101-6
High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities
resolves10.1080/08985620601002246
Money, money, money? A longitudinal investigation of entrepreneur career reasons, growth preferences and achieved growth
resolves10.1111/1467-9310.00187
Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin‐off companies in Italy
resolves10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00113-1
A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010
The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004
Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links
resolves10.1007/BF01097964
Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science
resolves10.1177/05390184030423002
Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm
resolves10.1080/1366271032000068078
Research Universities and Local Economic Development: Lessons from the History of the Johns Hopkins University
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2003.08.004
The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs
resolves10.1023/A:1021674618658
University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.007
Which model of technology transfer for nanotechnology? A comparison with biotech and microelectronics
resolves10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence
resolves10.1007/s10961-009-9126-2
Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation?
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.002
Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas
resolves10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4
Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany
resolves10.1007/s10961-008-9086-y
Proof of concept centers: accelerating the commercialization of university innovation
resolves10.1007/s10961-010-9196-1
In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs
resolves10.1162/003465398557221
Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00147-5
The changing composition of innovative activity in the US — a portrait based on patent analysis
resolves10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00083-3
Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: ‘The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with’
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001
The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.007
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model
resolves10.1007/s10961-011-9217-8
The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage: productivity changes in university technology transfer
resolves10.1007/s10961-006-9061-4
Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying Entrepreneurship Theory to Practice
resolves10.1080/10508422.2010.491759
Ethical Conflicts in Commercialization of University Research in the Post–Bayh–Dole Era
resolves10.1108/14626000310504684
Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university‐based business
resolves10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00101-3
Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(95)00857-8
‘Technology transfer’ and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration
resolves10.1023/A:1007895322042
The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.015
Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies
resolves10.1093/icc/dtm020
An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006
Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies
resolves10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034127.01889.86
Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter?
resolves10.1007/s00168-012-0511-7
Technology commercialization on campus: twentieth century frameworks and twenty-first century blind spots
resolves10.1016/0048-7333(91)90052-R
Using academic technology: Transfer methods and licensing incidence in the commercialization of American diagnostic imaging equipment research, 1954–1988
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980
resolves10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00088-2
When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive?
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities
resolves10.1023/A:1007892413701
To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008
University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship
resolves10.1080/09537325.2012.705119
How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for university spin-offs: proof-of-concept, pre-seed, and seed funding
resolves10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00114-3
Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States
resolves10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study
resolves10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416
The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions
resolves10.1023/A:1007884111883
Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing
resolves10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.004
Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0
Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies
The 32 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAssociation of University Technology Managers
(2012). http://www.autm.net/Bayh_Dole_Act.htm.
no DOI — not checkedBarnett, G.
(2010). Research Enterprise Blog, ‘37 CFR 401.9.’Last modified November 4. Accessed February 29, 2012. http://rtei.org/blog/2010/11/04/37-cfr-401-9/.
no DOI — not checkedBarnett, G.
(2011). Research Enterprise Blog, ‘Mapping Bayh-Dole Flow of Control.’Last modified June 24. Accessed February 20, 2012. http://rtei.org/blog/2011/06/24/mapping-bayh-dole-flow-of-control/.
no DOI — not checkedBridging knowledge to commercialization: The good, the bad, and the challenging
no DOI — not checkedIntroduction: Commercialization of knowledge in a regional context: New perspectives
no DOI — not checkedUniversity Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: Faculty and Students in Spinoffs
no DOI — not checkedA Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific
no DOI — not checkedThe era of open innovation
no DOI — not checkedOpen Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
no DOI — not checkedChallenges to the Research University
no DOI — not checkedCreative Commons
. ‘About,’ http://creativecommons.org/about.
no DOI — not checkedBiobusiness on campus: Commercialization of university-developed biomedical technologies
no DOI — not checked2026032711373966500_ref033
no DOI — not checkedWhy and how to pursue creative works
no DOI — not checkedUniversity mission creep? Comparing EU and US faculty views of university involvement in regional economic development and commercialization
no DOI — not checkedGenerating spin-off from university based research: The potential of technology transfer
no DOI — not checkedThe open innovation imperative: Perspectives on success from faculty entrepreneurs
no DOI — not checkedTechnology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions
no DOI — not checkedThe Uses of the University
no DOI — not checkedMaximising the potential of university spin-outs: The development of second-order commercialisation activities
no DOI — not checkedAppropriating the returns from industrial research and development
no DOI — not checkedTechnology transfer and the end of the Bayh-Dole effect: Patents as an analytical lens on university-industry-government relations
no DOI — not checkedThe university as innovator: Bumps in the road
no DOI — not checkedInvention, innovation and entrepreneurship: The commercialization of university research by inventor-founded firms
no DOI — not checkedEntrepreneurship, Growth, and Public Policy
no DOI — not checkedUniversities and technology transfer: A review of academic entrepreneurship literature
no DOI — not checkedGlobal Entrepreneurship Monitor 2001 Executive Report
no DOI — not checkedAcademic entrepreneurship: Lessons learned for university administrators and policymakers
no DOI — not checkedAdvances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth
no DOI — not checkedAcademic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, States and Higher Education
no DOI — not checkedMarketing and selling creative works
no DOI — not checkedAcademic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: Rethinking the role of the entrepreneur
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1561/0300000048"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1561/0300000048/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1561/0300000048)