Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
THE IMPORTANCE OF CERTAIN ASSEMBLAGES OF BIRDS AS “INFORMATION‐CENTRES” FOR FOOD‐FINDING
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedR. G. Butler, and W. Trivelpiece .1981 .Nest spacing, reproductive success, and behavior of the Great Black-backed Gull (Larus marinus) .Auk,98:99 -107 .
no DOI — not checkedD. Cairns, 1980 .Nesting density, habitat structure and human disturbance as factors in Black Guillemot reproduction .Wilson Bulletin,92:352 -361 .
no DOI — not checkedD. Lack, 1967 .Interrelationships in breeding adaptations as shown by marine birds .Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress,14:3 -42 .
no DOI — not checkedD. Siegel-Causey, and G. L. Hunt .1986 .Breeding-site selection and colony formation in Double-crested and Pelagic Cormorants .Auk,103:230 -234 .
no DOI — not checkedD. L. Stokes, and P. D. Boersma .1991 .Effects of substrate on the distribution of Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) burrows .Auk,108:923 -933 .
no DOI — not checkedD. L. Stokes, and P. D. Boersma .1998 .Nest site characteristics and reproductive success in Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) .Auk,115:34 -49 .
no DOI — not checkedD. L. Stokes, and P. D. Boersma .1999 .Where breeding Magellanic Penguins forage: satellite telemetry results and their implications for penguin conservation .Marine Ornithology,27:59 -65 .
no DOI — not checkedP. Yorio, and P. D. Boersma .1994 .Consequences of nest desertion and inattendance for Magellanic Penguin hatching success .Auk,111:215 -218 .
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.