2 of 29 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-25
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed <i>Rubus alceifolius</i> Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers
Seed Size Variation in Desmodium Paniculatum: I. Factors Affecting Seed Size
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedD. R. Clements, D. J. Peterson, and R. Prasad .2001 .The biology of Canadian weeds. 112. Ulex europaeus L .Canadian Journal of Plant Science,81:325 -337 .
no DOI — not checkedJ. R. Hosking, J. M. B. Smith, and A. W. Sheppard .1996 .The biology of Australian weeds 28. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link subsp. scoparius .Plant Protection Quarterly,11:102 -108 .
no DOI — not checkedJ. Kigel, 1992 .Diaspore heteromorphism and germination in populations of the ephemeral Hedypnois rhagadioloides (L) Schmidt, F. W. (Asteraceae) inhabiting a geographic range of increasing aridity .Acta Oecologia,13:45 -53 .
no DOI — not checkedD. J. Peterson, and R. Prasad .1998 .The biology of Canadian weeds. 109. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link .Canadian Journal of Plant Science,78:497 -504 .
no DOI — not checkedR. G. Richardson, and R. L. Hill .1998 .The biology of Australian weeds 34. Ulex europaeus L .Plant Protection Quarterly,13:46 -58 .
no DOI — not checkedJ. M. B. Smith, and R. L. Harlen .1991 .Preliminary observations on the seed dynamics of broom (Cytisus scoparius) at Barrington Tops, New South Wales .Plant Protection Quarterly,6:73 -78 .
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.