1 of 25 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-22
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
6 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0599:PSGDBO]2.0.CO;2
Metabolism and evaporative water loss of Western Australian geckos (Reptilia : Sauria : Gekkonomorpha)
The 6 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedG. Caughley, J. Short, G. C. Grigg, and H. Nix .1987 .Kangaroos and climate: an analysis of distribution .Journal of Animal Ecology,1987:751 -761 .
no DOI — not checkedB. W. Grant, and W. P. Porter .1992 .Modeling global macroclimatic constraints on ectotherm energy budgets .American Zoologist,32:154 -178 .
no DOI — not checkedM. Kearney, and A. Moussalli .2003 .Geographic parthenogenesis in the Australian arid zone. II. Climatic analyses of orthopteroid insects of the genus Warramaba and Sipyloidea .Evolutionary Ecology Research,5:977 -997 .
no DOI — not checkedM. Kearney, A. Moussalli, J. Strasburg, D. Lindenmayer, and C. Moritz .2003 .Geographic parthenogenesis in the Australian arid zone. I. A climatic analysis of the Heteronotia binoei complex (Gekkonidae) .Evolutionary Ecology Research,5:953 -976 .
no DOI — not checkedM. Kearney, and R. Shine .2004 .Developmental success, stability and plasticity in closely-related parthenogenetic and sexual lizards (Heteronotia, Gekkonidae) .Evolution,58:1560 -1572 .
no DOI — not checkedM. T. Sykes, I. C. Prentice, and W. Cramer .1996 .A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species present and future climates .Journal of Biogeography,23:203 -233 .
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.