Reference health
Ethical Evaluations of Accountants: An Empirical Study of Latin America and the United States
30/30 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 30 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/bf01119858
Masculine and feminine voices: Making ethical decisions in the care of the dying
resolves10.1007/bf00881445
A multidimensional scale for measuring business ethics: A purification and refinement
resolves10.1007/bf00872363
Identifying the gaps in ethical perceptions between managers and salespersons: A multidimensional approach
resolves10.1007/bf00881438
Business ethics and job-related constructs: A cross-cultural comparison of automotive salespeople
resolves10.1007/bf00383291
Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: Myth or reality?
resolves10.1023/A:1012583424721
A Multidimensional Approach to Finnish Managers' Moral Decision-Making
resolves10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490340
Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States
resolves10.1177/0022022196276004
A Cross-Cultural Study of Moral Stage Structure in Hong Kong Chinese, English, and Americans
resolves10.1023/A:1010643309056
The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings
resolves10.1007/bf00383050
Some initial steps toward improving the measurement of ethical evaluations of marketing activities
resolves10.1177/009207039101900202
An Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups
resolves10.1006/cpac.1996.0005
THE KOHLBERG–GILLIGAN CONTROVERSY: LESSONS FOR ACCOUNTING ETHICS EDUCATION
resolves10.2307/2491165
An Investigation of the Reporting of Questionable Acts in an International Setting
resolves10.1080/08832329909601688
An Empirical Investigation of Cultural Differences in Ethical Decisionmaking Among U.S. Accounting Students
resolves10.1016/0748-5751(94)90016-7
An analysis of the association of traditional demographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing students and auditors
resolves10.1108/02651339410073015
A Cross‐cultural Study of Moral Philosophies, Ethical Perceptions and
Judgements
resolves10.1007/s10551-005-4773-1
Linking Culture and Ethics: A Comparison of Accountants’ Ethical Belief Systems in the Individualism/Collectivism and Power Distance Contexts
resolves10.1023/A:1009832018849
Individualism-Collectivism Cultural Differences Affecting Perceptions of Unethical Practices: Some Evidence from Australian and Indonesian Accounting Students
resolves10.1007/bf00871896
Bribery and extortion in international business: Ethical perceptions of Greeks compared to Americans
resolves10.1007/bf00411021
Cross-cultural business ethics: Ethical beliefs difference between blacks and whites
resolves10.1016/s0020-7063(96)90016-3
Auditors' ethical reasoning: Some audit conflict and cross cultural evidence
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedA multidimensional analysis of selected issues in accounting
no DOI — not checkedA comparative study of auditors' attitudes to uncertainty qualifications: An empirical test of the strong versus weak uncertainty avoidance hypothesis
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedCulture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations
no DOI — not checkedA bicultural study of independent auditors' perceptions of unethical business practices
no DOI — not checkedMoral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental
no DOI — not checkedMultidimensional ethics scale usefulness to explain and predict ethical evaluations and intentions of Latin American accountants. Paper presented at the ABO Research Conference
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedThe moral expertise of auditors: An exploratory analysis
no DOI — not checkedMoral judgment, behavior, decision-making and attitudes
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1023131"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1023131/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1023131)