Reference health
Accounting for Productivity: Is it Ok to Assume that the World is Cobb-Douglas?
2 of 17 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-28
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1162/088933601320224829
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/3585220
The 15 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/30035949
Total Factor Productivity Revisited: A Dual Approach to Development Accounting
resolves10.1016/j.jedc.2009.03.002
Life-cycle savings, bequest, and a diminishing impact of scale on growth
resolves10.1023/A:1009830421147
A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation of the Aggregate Production Function Specification
resolves10.1093/wber/15.2.177
What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models
resolves10.1162/003355399555954
Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
resolves10.1257/000282802760015676
How Important Is Human Capital for Development? Evidence from Immigrant Earnings
resolves10.1111/j.1475-4932.1960.tb00537.x
GROWTH and THE ELASTICITY OF FACTOR SUBSTITUTION<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2354.2004.00123.x
Barriers to Capital Accumulation and Aggregate Total Factor Productivity*
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMeasurement of the Elasticity of Factor Substitution and Bias of Technical Change
no DOI — not checkedA New Database on Physical Capital Stock: Sources, Methodology and Results
no DOI — not checkedA Sceptical Note on the Constancy of Relative Shares
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1151790"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1151790/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1151790)