Reference health
Experimenter Demand Effects in Economic Experiments
5 of 106 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-02
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
28 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.60.3.398
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01669207
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01669303
does not resolve to a known work10.1007/bf01669204
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.35.7.530
The 101 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.334
The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact.
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00302
Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
resolves10.1162/00335530360535153
"Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences
resolves10.1037/h0093718
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.
resolves10.1016/s0167-4870(03)00065-5
Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00134.x
The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1016/s0899-8256(02)00012-x
The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: an experimental study
resolves10.1016/s0167-2681(02)00044-6
Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving
resolves10.1007/s10683-006-7053-8
Tax compliance and obedience to authority at home and in the lab: A new experimental approach
resolves10.1162/00335530360535207
Macroeconomic Expectations of Households and Professional Forecasters
resolves10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00880-3
A test for comparative income effects in an ultimatum bargaining experiment
resolves10.1023/A:1020317321607
Voluntary Participation and Spite in Public Good Provision Experiments: An International Comparison
resolves10.1007/s10683-008-9206-4
The control of game form recognition in experiments: understanding dominant strategy failures in a simple two person “guessing” game
resolves10.1093/ei/39.2.238
The effect of recommended contributions in the voluntary provision of public goods
resolves10.1080/13669870701486913
Social Desirability Influences on Judgements of Biotechnology Across the Dimensions of Risk, Ethicality and Naturalness
resolves10.1016/s0165-1765(98)00162-1
Good news for experimenters: subjects do not care about your welfare
resolves10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00160-2
Private costs and public benefits: unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior
resolves10.1037/h0028853
Confession of awareness and prior knowledge of deception as a function of interview set and approval motivation.
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00735
Some Experimental Evidence on the Evolution of Discrimination, Co‐Operation and Perceptions of Fairness
resolves10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::aid-mar2>3.0.co;2-0
Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing
resolves10.1002/9780470998557.ch16
An Evolutionary‐Psychological Approach to Self‐esteem: Multiple Domains and Multiple Functions
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00222
Nonspeculative Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets: Lack of Common Knowledge of Rationality vs. Actual Irrationality
resolves10.1257/jep.21.2.153
What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?
resolves10.1177/0146167204264004
The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves
resolves10.1257/000282803321455359
Monetary and Nonmonetary Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism
resolves10.1037/h0043424
On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.
resolves10.1016/b978-0-12-558250-6.50014-6
COMMUNICATION BY THE TOTAL EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION: WHY IT IS IMPORTANT, HOW IT IS EVALUATED, AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY OF FINDINGS
resolves10.1006/game.1997.0630
More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2006.03.005
Advice and behavior in intergenerational ultimatum games: An experimental approach
resolves10.1007/s10683-006-5386-y
Trust and trustworthiness in games: An experimental study of intergenerational advice
resolves10.1080/13501780500086081
Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments
resolves10.1007/s10683-007-9162-4
Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: Experimental evidence
resolves10.2307/1911361
Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets
resolves10.1257/jel.38.2.332
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.23
Prospect relativity: How choice options influence decision under risk.
resolves10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.002
Implicit emotional biases in decision making: The case of the Iowa Gambling Task
resolves10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.01.009
Incidental encoding of emotional pictures: Affective bias studied through event related brain potentials
resolves10.1023/b:theo.0000004350.81892.1b
Verbal and Behavioral Learning in a Probability Compounding Task
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2006.06.008
Perceived harmony, similarity and cooperation in 2 × 2 games: An experimental study
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCooperation in public goods experiments: Kindness or confusion?
no DOI — not checkedTesting noncooperative bargaining theory: A preliminary study
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedThe bases of social power
no DOI — not checkedThe cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedNobody's watching? Subtle cues affecting generosity in an anonymous economic game
no DOI — not checkedforthcoming). The value of groups
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedScientific myths that are too good to die
no DOI — not checkedUsability studies and the Hawthorne effect
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedref96
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedThe Hawthorne defect: persistence of a flawed theory
no DOI — not checkedref106
no DOI — not checkedref114
no DOI — not checkedThe impact of downward social information on contribution decisions
no DOI — not checkedref117
no DOI — not checkedref134
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1163863"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1163863/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1163863)