Reference health
Standard-Setting, Innovation Specialists, and Competition Policy
20/20 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
44 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 20 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u170843
Anderson, Lindsay (Gordon), (17 April 1923–30 Aug. 1994), film and theatre director
resolves10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00118.x
The rules of standard‐setting organizations: an empirical analysis
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1019611
Revisiting Injunctive Relief: Interpreting eBay in High-Tech Industries with Non-Practicing Patent Holders
resolves10.1111/joie.12033
‘Essential’ Patents, <scp>FRAND</scp> Royalties and Technological Standards
resolves10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u225417
Fitzgerald, Denis P., (29 April 1871–9 April 1947), Professor of Anatomy, 1909–42, now Emeritus Professor, University College, Cork; ex-Member of Board of Studies, NUI
resolves10.54648/WOCO2006038
Standardization and Technological Innovation: Some Reflections on Ex-ante Licensing, FRAND, and the Proper Means to Reward Innovators
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhp006
FEDERALISM, SUBSTANTIVE PREEMPTION, AND LIMITS ON ANTITRUST: AN APPLICATION TO PATENT HOLDUP
resolves10.18060/3813
Standard Setting, Patents, and Access Lock-In: RAND Licensing and the Theory of the Firm
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1080.0919
Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhp007
PATENT HOLDUP AND OLIGOPSONISTIC COLLUSION IN STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS
The 44 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedResearches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth
no DOI — not checkedGuidelines on the Application of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to Technology Transfer Agreements
no DOI — not checkedStandard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedThe N-Data and Rambus Cases: FTC May Be Moving Toward Regulation of Standard-Setting Conduct Claims Through Use of General Unfairness Standard
no DOI — not checkedThe Logic and Limits of Ex Ante Competition in a Standard-Setting Environment
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedCan Standard-Setting Lead to Exploitative Abuse? A Dissonant View on Patent-Hold-up, Royalty Stacking, and the Meaning of FRAND
no DOI — not checkedThe Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedComments Regarding Competition and Intellectual Property
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedRevitalizing Section 5 of the FTC Act Using 'Consumer Choice' Analysis
no DOI — not checkedPatents in Motion: The Troubling Implications of the N-Data Settlement
no DOI — not checkedPricing Patents for Licensing in Standard-Setting Organizations: Making Sense of FRAND Commitments
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedTen Things to Do about Patent Holdup of Standards (and one Not to)
no DOI — not checkedAre Universities Patent Trolls?
no DOI — not checkedPatent Holdup and Royalty Stacking
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedPositive and Normative Implications of the Third AntiPatent Crusade
no DOI — not checkedPatent Licensing and R&D Competition
no DOI — not checkedNavigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting
no DOI — not checkedSetting Compatibility Standards, Cooperation or Collusion
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedConcerted Buying Power: Its Potential for Addressing the Patent Holdup Problem in Standard Setting
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedStandards Selection, and Control of Market Power
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedref61
no DOI — not checkedStandards and Market Power
no DOI — not checkedRecent Developments in the United States, EU, and Asia at the Intersection of Antitrust and Patent Law
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1219784"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1219784/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1219784)