At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1287/orsc.1070.0276Perspective—Historical Roots of the<i>A Behavioral Theory of the Firm</i>Model at GSIA
resolves10.1086/294138The Development of Economics and Administration in the School of Business
resolves10.2307/254479A FOUNDATION EXPRESSES ITS INTEREST IN HIGHER EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
resolves10.2307/3113736Positive Business Responses to the New Deal: The Roots of the Committee for Economic Development, 1933–1942
resolves10.1287/opre.50.1.35.17778Abraham Charnes and W. W. Cooper (et al.): A Brief History of a Long Collaboration in Developing Industrial Uses of Linear Programming
resolves10.1002/jhbs.20189Herbert Simon and the GSIA: Building an interdisciplinary community
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1014015Sharpening Tools in the Workshop: The Workshop System and the Chicago School's Success
resolves10.2307/2325486Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
resolves10.1086/253246The Basic Elements and Their Proper Balance in the Curriculum of a Collegiate Business School
resolves10.1086/252163The College of Commerce and Administration of the University of Chicago
resolves10.1086/253247The Basic Elements and Their Proper Balance in the Curriculum of a Collegiate Business School: Discussion
resolves10.2307/2977928Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk
resolves10.4159/9780674495111-0076. Reinventing Monopoly and the Role of Corporations: The Roots of Chicago Law and Economics
resolves10.5860/choice.44-6347The Chicago School: how the University of Chicago assembled the thinkers who revolutionized economics and business
resolves10.1086/ahr/71.4.1451-aThe Emergence of the American University. By <i>Laurence R. Veysey</i>. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1965. Pp. xiv, 505. $10.00.)
The 66 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedEconomics in the Curricula of Schools of Business: Discussion
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedGordon to Chamberlain Memo
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedThe Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation and the Formulation of Public Policy
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedThe Place of Economics in the Curriculum of a School of Business
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref56
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedref60
no DOI — not checkedThe Trial of Scott Nearing and the
no DOI — not checkedThe Economics Profession and the Making of Public Policy
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedref69
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedUneasy Relationship: The Business Community and Academic Economists at the University of Pennsylvania
no DOI — not checkedref75
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedref84
no DOI — not checkedThe Rise of Modern Finance Theory: Its Characteristics As a Scientific Field and Connections to the Changing Structure of the Capital Markets
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedHarvard and those other big, dumb old business-oriented business schools on one side and the nose-in-the-air traditional disciplines on the other. Initially, both Harvard and the disciplines brushed us off, an upstart fly buzzing about in the Pittsburgh smog. Who had ever heard of Carnegie Tech? For our part
no DOI — not checkedCan You Teach Management?
no DOI — not checkedThe New York Times applauded Harvard Business School's brief pamphlet Education for Business Responsibility as an intellectual turning point for developing a free-market retort to those academics calling for greater governmental involvement in the economy
no DOI — not checkedref92
no DOI — not checkedAs one member of the Ford Foundation program on business education described the situation: "[T]hat first year and a half or so was a continuing sort of running skirmish between Don (Donald David, Harvard Business School former dean who went on to become executive chair of the Ford Foundation) and the Program where Don was pushing the Program-where in effect, I think it's fair to say that Don was saying?"Look we can easily make a deal here. Just deal us in and I'm your friend. If you deal us out, I'm going to oppose you at every turn." (FFA, Oral History Project, Berelson 1973) As a result, Ford support to Harvard Business School was largely directed toward increasing the school's endowment and diffusing its case study method, whereas everywhere else the foundation was much more actively pushing schools to embrace a social science model
no DOI — not checkedref94
no DOI — not checkedref95
no DOI — not checkedref96
no DOI — not checkedref97
no DOI — not checkedref98
no DOI — not checkedref99
no DOI — not checkedref100
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref102
no DOI — not checkedref103
no DOI — not checkedref104
no DOI — not checkedJensen focuses on three benefits of takeovers, stating that they do not harm shareholders. They are an efficient use of a company's resources. And, that golden parachutes which guarantee multi-million dollar payouts to CEOs in the event of a takeover are defensible since shareholders still
no DOI — not checkedA Helping Hand for Entrenched Managers
no DOI — not checkedref107
no DOI — not checkedFrom this point of view, one of the important lessons of the present study is the significance of personal networks and intellectual genealogies to understand disciplinary change, in a manner not unlike Collins (1998) and Frickel and Gross
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.