Reference health
Base-Rate Respect by Intuition: Approximating Rational Choices in Base-Rate Tasks with Multiple Cues
4 of 34 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
2 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-295x.100.3.432
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-295x.102.4.684
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.534
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.380
The 30 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/02724980543000132
Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.002
Modeling patterns of probability calibration with random support theory: Diagnosing case-based judgment
resolves10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.611
Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load.
resolves10.1126/science.1121629
On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect
resolves10.1037//0096-3445.129.3.399
A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: Beyond base rate neglect and statistical format.
resolves10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.003
Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1090866
Modeling Option and Strategy Choices with Connectionist Networks: Towards an Integrative Model of Automatic and Deliberate Decision Making
resolves10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199912)12:4<307::aid-bdm324>3.0.co;2-h
What does and does not alleviate base-rate neglect under direct experience
resolves10.1109/tsmc.1987.6499282
Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment
resolves10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.3
Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction.
resolves10.1017/s0140525x00041157
The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges
resolves10.1146/annurev.psych.45.1.197
Psychology and Economics: Perspectives on Risk, Cooperation, and the Marketplace
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814
The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction.
resolves10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
resolves10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.181
Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.
The 2 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedWhen do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell?
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1316848"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1316848/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1316848)