Reference health

Hicks-Marshall Conditions and Defining Antitrust Markets for Intermediate Goods

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1323415
CiteStamped reference-health badge
15/15 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-08

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 15 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2139/ssrn.854025
Market Definition: An Analytical Overview
resolves10.1509/jmkr.42.2.141.62296
New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity
resolves10.4337/9781843769767.00041
Commission notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law
resolves10.1177/0003603x0104600204
Critical Thinking about “Critical Loss” in Antitrust
resolves10.1177/0003603X7802300101
The Problem of Geographic Market Delineation Revisited: The Case of Coal
resolves10.2202/1935-1704.1563
Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition
resolves10.1177/0003603x0705200203
Market Definition in Crude Oil: Estimating the Effects of the BP/ARCO Merger
resolves10.1007/bf02284671
Input market definition under department of Justice Merger Guidelines
resolves10.1093/joclec/nhl025
MARKET ANALYSIS IN THE PRESENCE OF INDIRECT CONSTRAINTS AND CAPTIVE SALES
resolves10.1177/0003603x0104600203
Critical Loss Analysis in Evaluating Mergers
resolves10.1057/9781137375261
Principles of Economics
resolves10.2139/ssrn.402100
A Critical Analysis of Critical Loss Analysis
resolves10.4135/9781604265774.n1284
Thomas v. Board of Education, Granville (2d Cir. 1979)
resolves10.1007/bf01034180
Department of justice and federal trade commission: Horizontal Merger Guidelines
resolves10.2139/ssrn.327281
Beyond Critical Loss: Tailoring Applications of the Hypothetical Monopolist Paradigm
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedNatural experiments
no DOI — not checkedImproving Critical Loss Analysis
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedCritical Loss: Let's Tell the Whole Story
no DOI — not checkedMarket Definition and Differentiated Products: The Need for a Workable Standard
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedDemand Elasticities in Antitrust Analysis
no DOI — not checkedMarket Power and Market Definition in Monopolization Cases: A Paradigm is Missing
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1323415"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1323415/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1323415/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1323415)