Reference health

Jekyll and Hyde Questions from the Bench: Does the Emotional Nature of Supreme Court Justices' Questions Affect their Votes on the Merits?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1407518
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 30 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-25

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1111/j.1059-4329.2005.00098.x
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0022-3514.36.10.1152
The 28 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/1961752
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
resolves10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00067.x
Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372144.001.0001
Friends of the Supreme Court
resolves10.1017/s1537592704040496
Introduction to the Symposium
resolves10.1017/s1537592704040538
Press Room Predictions
resolves10.1017/s0003055406062034
The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court
resolves10.1093/pan/10.2.134
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
resolves10.1017/s1537592704040502
Competing Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making
resolves10.1093/pan/mpn018
Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict
resolves10.2307/448461
Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts: A Research Note
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511615696
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited
resolves10.1080/07343460109507749
Wading Knee Deep in Words, Words, Words": Senatorial Rhetoric in the Johnson and Clinton Impeachment Trials
resolves10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00007.x
Projecting Presidential Personas on the Radio: An Addendum on the Bushes
resolves10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00017.x
“The Great Communicator” and “The Great Talker” on the Radio: Projecting Presidential Personas
resolves10.1177/106591299304600207
Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court
resolves10.2307/2131944
The Dimensions of Cue-Taking in the House of Representatives: Variation by Issue Area
resolves10.1080/00335637609383355
The functions of oral argument in the U.S. supreme court
resolves10.1016/b978-0-12-558704-4.50011-6
THE DICTIONARY OF AFFECT IN LANGUAGE
resolves10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.815
A Computer Program for the Objective Analysis of Style and Emotional Connotations of Prose: Hemingway, Galsworthy, and Faulkner Compared
resolves10.1023/A:1017569003556
The Times and the Man as Predictors of Emotion and Style in the Inaugural Addresses of U.S. Presidents
resolves10.2466/pms.1986.62.3.875
A Dictionary of Affect in Language: IV. Reliability, Validity, and Applications
resolves10.2466/pms.88.1.76-86
LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY OF ABSTRACTS AND TITLES IN HIGHLY CITED JOURNALS
resolves10.2466/pr0.1998.82.2.643
Objective Analysis of Text: II. Using an Emotional Compass to Describe the Emotional Tone of Situation Comedies
resolves10.1007/bf00055109
Traditional and emotional stylometric analysis of the songs of Beatles Paul McCartney and John Lennon
resolves10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.459
The Emotionality of William Blake's Poems: A Quantitative Comparison of <i>Songs of Innocence</i> with <i>Songs of Experience</i>
resolves10.2466/pms.84.1.115-125
CONTENT, STYLE, AND EMOTIONAL TONE OF TEXTS IN INTRODUCTORY PSYCHOLOGY
resolves10.2466/pms.1998.86.3.1048
Emotion and Style in 30-Second Television Advertisements Targeted at Men, Women, Boys, and Girls
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368628.001.0001
Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSymposium on Oral Arguments
no DOI — not checkedJustices Make Points by Questioning Lawyers
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedGender Differences in the Emotional Tone of Written Sexual Fantasies
no DOI — not checkedJustices Indicate They May Uphold Voter ID Rules
no DOI — not checkedTalk to the Newsroom: Supreme Court Reporter
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedDecision-Making by U.S. House of Representatives: A Preliminary Model
no DOI — not checkedWhen in Doubt, Look to Roberts for Outcome of Supreme Court Case
no DOI — not checkedExplaining Executive Success in the
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedThe Illusion of Devil's Advocacy: How the Justices of the Supreme Court Foreshadow Their Decisions During Oral Argument
no DOI — not checkedref33
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1407518"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1407518/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1407518/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1407518)