Reference health

What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's NOx Trading Program

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1416787
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 28 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-27

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2289064
does not resolve to a known work10.2307/2335942
The 26 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x
Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
resolves10.1257/aer.98.3.843
Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout's Mechanism
resolves10.1006/enrs.1995.1021
Race, Class, and Environmental Health: A Review and Systematization of the Literature
resolves10.1146/annurev.energy.30.081804.121028
ECONOMICS OF POLLUTION TRADING FOR SO<sub>2</sub>AND NO<sub><i>X</i></sub>
resolves10.1162/rest_a_00431
New Evidence on the Finite Sample Properties of Propensity Score Reweighting and Matching Estimators
resolves10.4337/9781781001400.00015
Federal actions to address environmental justice in minority populations and low-income populations: Executive Order 12898
resolves10.1177/0193841x08317586
Weighting Regressions by Propensity Scores
resolves10.2307/3146955
Transaction Costs in Pollution Markets: An Empirical Study
resolves10.1126/science.1536006
Valuing the Health Benefits of Clean Air
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-37562-5_12
Economic Incentives Versus Command and Control: What’s the Best Approach for Solving Environmental Problems?
resolves10.2307/1912352
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
resolves10.2307/2971733
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme
resolves10.2307/2999630
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
resolves10.3386/w14254
When to Pollute, When to Abate? Intertemporal Permit Use in the Los Angeles NOx Market
resolves10.1080/09640569711895
A Mixed Bag: Assessmentof Market Performance and Firm Trading Behaviour in the NOx Reclaim Programme
resolves10.3386/w13512
Averting Regulatory Enforcement: Evidence from New Source Review
resolves10.4324/9781315194288-10
The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy
resolves10.1177/10780870122184993
Environmental Justice and Southern California’s “Riskscape”
resolves10.1177/0049124106289164
Matching Estimators of Causal Effects
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970215)16:3<285::AID-SIM535>3.0.CO;2-#
TOWARD A CURSE OF DIMENSIONALITY APPROPRIATE (CODA) ASYMPTOTIC THEORY FOR SEMI‐PARAMETRIC MODELS
resolves10.1080/01621459.1995.10476493
Analysis of Semiparametric Regression Models for Repeated Outcomes in the Presence of Missing Data
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-37562-5_13
Benefits and Costs From Sulfur Dioxide Trading: A Distributional Analysis
resolves10.1002/pam.20094
Equity and information: Information regulation, environmental justice, and risks from toxic chemicals
resolves10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011
Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?
resolves10.1257/jep.12.3.69
What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1026353
A U.S. Cap-and-Trade System to Address Global Climate Change
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedCan the Market be Fair and Efficient? An Environmental Justice Critique of Emissions Trading
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedPollution Trading and Environmental Injustice: Los Angeles' Failed Experiment in Air Quality Policy
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedThe U.S. SO 2 Cap-and-Trade Program
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedRECLAIM: Southern California's Failed Experiment With Air Pollution Trading
no DOI — not checkedref37
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedPublished annually beginning with compliance year 1994
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedref51
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref53
no DOI — not checkedref54
no DOI — not checkedClimate Change: The Equity Problem
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1416787"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1416787/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1416787/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1416787)