Reference health

Tests of Benefit Transfer Across Sites and Populations in the Fitzroy Basin, Research Report No. 4

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1440623
CiteStamped reference-health badge
23/23 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

14 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 23 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1029/91wr02598
Bayesian exchangeability, benefit transfer, and research efficiency
resolves10.4337/9781781008102.00017
Benefit transfer: testing for accuracy and reliability
resolves10.1111/1467-8489.00119
Valuing remnant vegetation in Central Queensland using choice modelling
resolves10.1029/91wr02591
Benefit transfer studies: Myths, pragmatism, and idealism
resolves10.1029/91wr02590
Benefit transfers: Conceptual and empirical issues
resolves10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00070-1
Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects
resolves10.1029/93wr00495
The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water
resolves10.1029/91wr02592
Benefit transfer: Conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies
resolves10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2
Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability
resolves10.1007/bf01065813
Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach
resolves10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00210-x
Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-s
Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
resolves10.1016/b978-0-444-81469-2.50011-0
Exploring a Budget Context for Contingent Valuation Estimates
resolves10.2307/1243782
The Implications of Model Specification for Welfare Estimation in Nested Logit Models
resolves10.2307/1924536
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1440620
Using Focus Groups to Design Choice Modeling Valuation Frameworks for Floodplain Development, Research Report No. 3
resolves10.1029/91wr02596
The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: Benefit function transfer
resolves10.1016/s0313-5926(01)50004-1
Non-Market Valuation Databases: How Useful are They?
resolves10.1111/1467-8276.00250
Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer
resolves10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00201-9
Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation
resolves10.1029/91wr02594
On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors”
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.t01-1-00228.x
Towards the development of a transferable set of value estimates for environmental attributes
resolves10.1029/91wr02597
Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand studies, 1968–1988
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedReport of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedTransferring Environmental Value Estimates Across NSW Rivers
no DOI — not checkedDesigning Choice Modelling Surveys Using Focus Groups: Results from the Macquarie Marshes and Gwydir Wetlands Case Studies
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedTesting for Framing Effects in Environmental Choice Modelling
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedNon-Market Values of Wetlands: A Choice Modelling Study of Wetlands in the Upper South East of South Australia and the Murrumbidgee River Floodplain in New South Wales
no DOI — not checkedValuing Floodplain Development in the Fitzroy BasinProject Overview
no DOI — not checkedref37
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1440623"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1440623/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1440623/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1440623)