Reference health

Neglect of Multiplicity When Testing Families of Related Hypotheses*

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1466343
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 69 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-17

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

23 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0033-2909.86.3.638
does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0003-066x.54.8.594
The 67 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2491464
Fundamental Analysis, Future Earnings, and Stock Prices
resolves10.1198/016214508000001110
Index to Volume 103 (2008)
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00991.x
SOME TIME SERIES PROPERTIES OF ACCOUNTING INCOME
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
resolves10.7551/mitpress/2576.001.0001
The Econometrics of Corporate Governance Studies
resolves10.2469/faj.v49.n5.36
Estimating Expected Return
resolves10.4135/9781412961288.n455
Teoria Statistica Delle Classi e Calcolo Delle Probabilità
resolves10.1016/j.aos.2005.06.003
The most influential journals in academic accounting
resolves10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1011
Emphasis on Pro Forma versus GAAP Earnings in Quarterly Press Releases: Determinants, SEC Intervention, and Market Reactions
resolves10.1016/0361-3682(96)00012-8
Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis
resolves10.1001/jama.280.3.296
Phenomena of Retraction
resolves10.2307/1907042
Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?
resolves10.1111/j.1475-679x.2004.00161.x
Do Insiders Manipulate Earnings When They Sell Their Shares in an Initial Public Offering?
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01692.x
MORTGAGE LENDING TO MINORITIES: WHERE'S THE BIAS?
resolves10.2307/1928442
Data Mining as an Industry
resolves10.1007/978-0-387-49317-6
Multiple Testing Procedures with Applications to Genomics
resolves10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y
Publication bias in clinical research
resolves10.1542/peds.67.6.911
Subclinical Levels of Lead and Developmental Deficit—A Multivariate Follow-up Reassessment
resolves10.2307/2325486
Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
resolves10.1086/260400
The Consequences of Journal Editorial Policies and a Suggestion for Revision
resolves10.1126/science.3057627
Scientific Standards in Epidemiologic Studies of the Menace of Daily Life
resolves10.1111/1540-6261.00571
Spurious Regressions in Financial Economics?
resolves10.1080/00031305.1987.10475450
Frequency of Selecting Noise Variables in Subset Regression Analysis: A Simulation Study
resolves10.4159/harvard.9780674063426.c16
10. Cordelia's Dilemma
resolves10.1023/A:1008313703909
Are There Sectoral Anomalies Too? The Pitfalls of Unreported Multiple Hypothesis Testing and a Simple Solution
resolves10.1037/h0076157
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01693.x
MORTGAGE LENDING IN BOSTON: A RECONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE
resolves10.1002/9780470316672
Multiple Comparison Procedures
resolves10.1111/1475-679x.00041
Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research
resolves10.1177/00131640121971202
Reporting Effect Sizes: The Roles of Editors, Textbook Authors, and Publication Manuals
resolves10.3329/jbsp.v2i0.987
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication Updated October 2007
resolves10.1001/jama.279.4.281
Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials
resolves10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
resolves10.1177/117693510800600001
Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses for Multiple Comparisons
resolves10.1080/00031305.1985.10479448
Cautionary Note about<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>
resolves10.1080/01621459.1974.10480138
False Models and Post-Data Model Construction
resolves10.2307/2491270
Fundamental Information Analysis
resolves10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00435.x
Publication System Biases Associated with the Statistical Testing Paradigm*
resolves10.1093/rfs/3.3.431
Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models
resolves10.2307/1924403
Data Mining
resolves10.1016/s0167-2231(76)80003-6
Econometric policy evaluation: A critique
resolves10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91641-6
MUNCHAUSEN'S STATISTICAL GRID,WHICH MAKES ALL TRIALS SIGNIFICANT
resolves10.1038/435737a
Scientists behaving badly
resolves10.1257/000282803322157133
Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study
resolves10.1037/h0049193
At random: Sense and nonsense.
resolves10.2307/2084615
The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action
resolves10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8
Simultaneous Statistical Inference
resolves10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3
The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
resolves10.1371/journal.pmed.0040028
Most Published Research Findings Are False—But a Little Replication Goes a Long Way
resolves10.2307/1909635
Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements
resolves10.1056/nejm197903293001301
Deficits in Psychologic and Classroom Performance of Children with Elevated Dentine Lead Levels
resolves10.1016/0165-4101(89)90017-7
Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns
resolves10.2307/2491068
Accounting Measurement, Price-Earnings Ratio, and the Information Content of Security Prices
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00615.x
Stepwise Multiple Testing as Formalized Data Snooping
resolves10.2139/ssrn.596101
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance
resolves10.3386/w6252
I Just Ran Four Million Regressions
resolves10.1037/h0083036
The importance of negative results in psychological research.
resolves10.2307/2282137
Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa
resolves10.1073/pnas.1530509100
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
resolves10.1111/0022-1082.00163
Data‐Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap
resolves10.1126/science.333584
Some Thoughts on Clinical Trials, Especially Problems of Multiplicity
resolves10.1080/01621459.1959.10501522
Publication Decisions and Tests of Significance—A Comment
resolves10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x
Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00152
A Reality Check for Data Snooping
resolves10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201
Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
resolves10.2307/2341482
Why do we Sometimes get Nonsense-Correlations between Time-Series?--A Study in Sampling and the Nature of Time-Series
The 23 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedEditorial Statement
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedEditorial Statement
no DOI — not checkedInference from Empirical Research
no DOI — not checkedReplication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedA Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedEmpirical Accounting Research Design for Ph
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedLet's Take the Con Out of Econometrics
no DOI — not checkedA Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions
no DOI — not checkedIncorporating Statistical Power into Our Tests of Significance: A Methodological and Empirical Inquiry
no DOI — not checkedThe Loss Function has been Mislaid: The Rhetoric of Significance Tests
no DOI — not checkedMortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting the HMDA Data
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedPublication Bias: The "File-Drawer" Problem in Scientific Inference
no DOI — not checkedref87
no DOI — not checkedref88
no DOI — not checkedref93
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-17 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1466343"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1466343/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1466343/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1466343)