Reference health
The Federal Government as Agent for Promoting Collaboration in Local Planning and Redevelopment: An Evaluation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Brownfield Facilitation Pilot Program
19/19 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-07
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/01944360308978018
Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making:<i>Six Strategic Planning Choices</i>
resolves10.1080/01944369308975850
Land Use Negotiation Reducing Conflict and Creating Wanted Land Uses
resolves10.1080/01944368708976450
Planning In the Face of Conflict: Negotiation and Mediation Strategies in local Land Use Regulation
resolves10.1080/01944360608976765
Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations
resolves10.1080/01944369208975816
Negotiating Intergovernmental Development Policy Conflicts: Practice-Based Guidelines
resolves10.1177/0891242403257437
Private Initiative and Public Responsibility for the Redevelopment of Industrial Brownfields: Three Baltimore Case Studies
resolves10.1080/01944369608975712
Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal
resolves10.1080/01944360408976338
Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making: Findings from Communities Facing Toxic Waste Cleanup
resolves10.1177/0739456x8400400103
Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector: The Planner as Mediator
resolves10.1080/01944369508975658
Marginalizing Public Participation in Local Planning: An Ethnographic Account
resolves10.31274/etd-180810-50
Brownfields redevelopment and gentrification: A socio-economic evaluation of the EPA Brownfields Pilot Program
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedCommunity Development: Re-use of Urban Industrial Sites
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1484799"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1484799/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1484799)