Reference health
Finding Support for Innovations in Quality Improvement Initiatives: Hidden Costs and Benefits
12/12 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 12 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00042-1
Innovation in technology versus innovation in financing: two case studies
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.001
Post-project reviews as a key project management competence
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.001
The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms
resolves10.1016/j.technovation.2007.08.001
Are TQM principles supporting innovation in the Portuguese footwear industry?
resolves10.4337/9781848440173.00009
Ex-ante Evaluation of Mega-Projects: Methodological Issues and Cost–Benefit Analysis
resolves10.1016/s0166-4972(97)00060-6
Integrating the costs of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision-making process
resolves10.1080/00137919808903192
Using Opportunity Costs to Determine the Cost of Quality: A Case Study in a Continuous-Process Industry
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedA Review of research on cost of quality models and best practices
no DOI — not checkedApplying Cost of Quality to a Service Business
no DOI — not checkedMeasuring and reporting the cost of quality
no DOI — not checkedDetermining optional quality costs by considering costs of lost sales
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref21
no DOI — not checkedSix Sigma Business Scorecard: Creating a Comprehensive Corporate Performance Measurement System
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref31
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedIncreasing value through the measurement of the cost of quality (CoQ) -A practical approach
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1499185"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1499185/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1499185)