Reference health

The Collapse of Positivist Jurisprudence Into Legal Realism After Dworkin

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1557354
CiteStamped reference-health badge
10/10 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-08

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

38 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 10 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0960-9776(12)70027-9
IN15 RANKL signalling: bone metastasis and beyond
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264124.003.0011
Lecture Ten— Practical Difference
resolves10.1001/jama.1971.03180370037007
Omitted Asterisk, Errant Footnote
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267904.003.0010
Authority and Reason
resolves10.3133/fs20163059
Landsat plays a key role in reducing hunger on earth
resolves10.31030/2667907
DIN 19426-1:2017-09, Auto-ID-Systeme zur digitalen Kennzeichnung und Klassifizierung von PSA_- Teil_1: Nummernstruktur, mit CD-ROM
resolves10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1213
Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to folate and blood formation (ID 79), homocysteine metabolism (ID 80), energy-yielding metabolism (ID 90), function of the immune system (ID 91), function of blood vessels (ID 94, 175, 192
resolves10.31223/osf.io/rhcws
Balancing sub- and supra-salt strain in salt-influenced rifts: Implications for extension estimates
resolves10.1002/9780470754160.ch7
Auto‐ID/RFID Infrastructure
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264124.001.0001
The Practice of Principle
The 38 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedOn the Genealogy of Morals
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref11
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref13
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref16
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref22
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedTalk about 'interpretation,' in short, isn't really doing any work in Dworkin: one can interpret the concept 31 conscious rational human beings exist. This set of assumptions shows that Coleman has no theory of subjectivity. There is a whole tradition of philosophy, in which Hegel, Nietzsche and Lacan are prominent, that rejects the pre-legality of the human subject. In this tradition, law and the subject are mutually constitutive. Neither can exist without the other. If this is so, the question of law's utility to human subjectivity is ill-formed
no DOI — not checked187 In contrast, let me begin what I think Dworkin is saying about justification. Dworkin agrees that law is law, and it must be followed. The problem is, we are not sure what the law is. Law must be interpreted and constructed. But this does not mean there is no law. Judges are not just making it up, as in legal realism. A legal event is an object that exceeds prior symbolization. It forcefully obtrudes upon the world-view judge and is traumatic
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedref35
no DOI — not checkedColeman, Methodology, supra note 21, at 321. This is not Dworkin's point. Rather, Dworkin argues that, for those holding the value "government of laws, not men," justification/authorization is an important (but not the only) function of law. Dworkin does not deny that a legal system may exclude the principle-there might be the rule of men, not laws. For example, in many medieval kingdoms, the king was above the law and had no constraints on him at all. Dworkin would still recognize monarchy as a legal system
no DOI — not checkedref39
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1557354"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1557354/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1557354/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1557354)