Reference health

Two Kinds of Concept: Implicit and Explicit

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1596336
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 20 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-10-08

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

1 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1037//0096-3445.120.1.3
The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.001.0001
In two minds: Dual processes and beyond
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005
The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications
resolves10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00166-4
Motion events in language and cognition
resolves10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?
resolves10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.006
The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky)
resolves10.1080/09528130802319128
SAL: an explicitly pluralistic cognitive architecture
resolves10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654
Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0013
What zombies can't do: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the irreducibility of reflective consciousness
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306880.001.0001
Doing without Concepts
resolves10.1006/jmla.1998.2593
Knowing versus Naming: Similarity and the Linguistic Categorization of Artifacts
resolves10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00021-4
Universality and language specificity in object naming
resolves10.3758/bf03206325
Conversation and convention: Enduring influences on name choice for common objects
resolves10.1126/science.1107621
Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?
resolves10.1086/516806
Splitting Concepts
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0006
The magical number two, plus or minus: Dual-process theory as a theory of cognitive kinds
resolves10.1111/1467-9280.00477
Exemplar Theory's Predicted Typicality Gradient Can Be Tested and Disconfirmed
resolves10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00043-7
Alternative strategies of categorization
resolves10.3758/bf03200864
Similarity- versus rule-based categorization
The 1 reference without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref5
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-10-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1596336"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1596336/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1596336/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1596336)