Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 47 checked references that resolve
resolves10.5040/9781849469944.ch-007‘Blasphemy Against Basics’: Doctrine, Conceptual Reasoning and Certain Decisions of the UK Supreme Court
resolves10.1023/a:1020258104318High vs Low Anxiety-Related Behavior Rats: An Animal Model of Extremes in Trait Anxiety
resolves10.4324/9781315089263-10Constitutional afterlife: The continuing impact of Thailand’s postpolitical constitution
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1287393The Epistemic Status of the Human Sciences: Critical Reflections on Foucault
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1492907Ambiguity About Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry into Legal Interpretation
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1520784Female Justices, Feminism and the Politics of Judicial Appointment: A Re-examination
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1520789The Supreme Court of Canada, <i>Charter</i> Dialogue and Deference
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1520765A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The U.K. Or Canada as a Model?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1527128Impermissible Ratemaking in Health-Insurance Reform: Why the Reid Bill is Unconstitutional
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1559923Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counter-Terrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans
The 64 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedinsofar as Wolf had failed to apply the exclusionary rule to the states. Mapp, 367 U.S. at 654-55. For more on the question of retroactivity with respect to Mapp and Wolf, see Paul Bender, The Retroactive Effect of an Overruling Constitutional Decision: Mapp v. Ohio, 110 U
no DOI — not checkedref4
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref8
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedRichard Fallon and Daniel Meltzer note that Justice Harlan's reconsideration of the issue began with the article by Paul Mishkin cited supra at note 71. Fallon & Meltzer, supra note 68, at 1743. Like Mishkin, Fallon and Meltzer noted
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedat 315-16; see also Morton J. Horwitz, The Supreme Court
no DOI — not checkedref15
no DOI — not checkedref17
no DOI — not checkedref18
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedref23
no DOI — not checkedref24
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref26
no DOI — not checkedref28
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref30
no DOI — not checkedref33
no DOI — not checkedConstitutional Sunsetting?: Justice O'Connor's Closing Comments in Grutter, 30 HASTINGS CONST
no DOI — not checkedToday the law is Y but we will delay implementing that law until tomorrow
no DOI — not checkedref38
no DOI — not checkedBut Justice Ginsburg questioned the majority's selection of twenty-five years as the relevant time frame for terminating such programs. In the twenty-five years since the Court's decision in Bakke, she noted, the status of race-conscious admissions policies had remained unsettled; in addition, the Court had declared public school segregation unconstitutional only twenty-five years before Bakke. 182 Both these facts, Justice Ginsburg hinted, suggested that in the long history of racial discrimination in America
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedref41
no DOI — not checkedref42
no DOI — not checkedref43
no DOI — not checkedref44
no DOI — not checkedref46
no DOI — not checkedref47
no DOI — not checkedref48
no DOI — not checkedref49
no DOI — not checkedref50
no DOI — not checkedConnor's Twenty-Five Year Expectation: The Legitimacy of Durational Limits in Grutter, 67 OHIO ST
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedThe Last Twenty Five Years of Affirmative Action?
no DOI — not checkedWhen the time comes to reassess the constitutionality of considering race in higher-education admissions, we will need social scientists to clearly demonstrate the educational benefits of diverse student bodies, and to better understand the links between role models in one generation and aspirations and achievements of succeeding generations
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref57
no DOI — not checkedref58
no DOI — not checkedref63
no DOI — not checkedref66
no DOI — not checkedref67
no DOI — not checkedref68
no DOI — not checkedref70
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedref76
no DOI — not checkedref79
no DOI — not checkedThe Unbounded Home
no DOI — not checkedref85
no DOI — not checkedref89
no DOI — not checkedref90
no DOI — not checkedref101
no DOI — not checkedref106
no DOI — not checkedref108
no DOI — not checkedref109
no DOI — not checkedref110
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.