Reference health
Scaling Up Ecosystem Services Values: Methodology, Applicability and a Case Study
59/59 checkable references clean · checked 2026-10-08
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 59 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/3146869
Contrasting Conventional with Multi-Level Modeling Approaches to Meta-Analysis: Expectation Consistency in U.K. Woodland Recreation Values
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003
The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
resolves10.2307/1243391
What Do We Know About Groundwater Values? Preliminary Implications from a Meta Analysis of Contingent‐Valuation Studies
resolves10.4324/9781351158961-11
The Valuation of Wetlands: Primary Versus Meta-Analysis Based Value Transfer
resolves10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4
The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature
resolves10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019
The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results
resolves10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00070-1
Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects
resolves10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.004
Benefits transfer of willingness to pay estimates and functions for health-risk reductions: a cross-country study
resolves10.1023/A:1008377604893
The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing
resolves10.1016/s0143-6228(01)00019-4
Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study
resolves10.2307/3147301
A Repeated Sampling Technique in Assessing the Validity of Benefit Transfer in Valuing Non-Market Goods
resolves10.17138/tgft(2)6-8
Developing methods to evaluate phenotypic variability in biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity of Brachiaria grasses
resolves10.4337/9781781008102.00018
Benefit function transfer versus meta-analysis as policy-making tools: a comparison
resolves10.1007/s10640-006-9047-6
Exploring Benefit Transfer: Disamenities of Waste Transfer Stations
resolves10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00084-7
Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
resolves10.1007/s10640-008-9226-8
Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?
resolves10.1007/s10640-005-3366-x
Context-Sensitive Benefit Transfer Using Stated Choice Models: Specification and Convergent Validity for Policy Analysis
resolves10.1086/261981
Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Models
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.017
Users and non-users of conservation areas: Are there differences in WTP, motives and the validity of responses in CVM surveys?
resolves10.1007/s10640-004-2303-8
Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer ? Are We Performing the Wrong Tests?
resolves10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.028
Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands
resolves10.1016/j.jfe.2006.09.003
20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis
resolves10.1080/000368496328209
How large is the extent of the market for public goods: evidence from a nationwide contingent valuation survey
resolves10.1016/j.jfe.2005.07.003
Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest fire prevention among three states of California, Florida and Montana
resolves10.1029/94wr02895
Testing Transferability of Recreation Demand Models Across Regions: A Study of Corps of Engineer Reservoirs
resolves10.2307/3147231
Vertically Summing Public Good Demand Curves: An Empirical Comparison of Economic versus Political Jurisdictions
resolves10.1029/91wr02596
The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: Benefit function transfer
resolves10.1016/0921-8009(96)00029-8
Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis
resolves10.1007/s10640-004-5268-8
National and International Benefit Transfer Testing with a Rigorous Test Procedure
resolves10.1080/09640560020001665
Economic Valuation of the Non-use Attributes of a Wetland: A Case-study for Lake Kerkini
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00080-8
The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California
resolves10.1006/jema.2001.0464
Evaluating the accuracy of the benefit transfer method: A rural water supply application in the USA
resolves10.1023/b:eare.0000035441.37039.8a
Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers between Countries?
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.018
Measurement, generalization, and publication: Sources of error in benefit transfers and their management
resolves10.1029/2000wr900006
Using meta‐analysis for benefit transfer: In‐sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database
resolves10.1007/1-4020-5405-x_3
Correspondence and Convergence in Benefit Transfer Accuracy: Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature
resolves10.1007/s10640-004-5266-x
Benefit Transfer: A Comparison of WTP for Air Quality between France and Germany
resolves10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00193-8
Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1555709
Migrants’ International Transfers and Educational Expenditure: Empirical Evidence from Albania
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1557031
Optimal Emission Tax with Endogenous Location Choice of Duopolistic Firms
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1557088
Potentials and Limits of Bayesian Networks to Deal with Uncertainty in the Assessment of Climate Change Adaptation Policies
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedValuing ecosystem services
no DOI — not checkedref2
no DOI — not checkedref3
no DOI — not checkedref5
no DOI — not checkedref6
no DOI — not checkedref7
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedref25
no DOI — not checkedref27
no DOI — not checkedWaterfowl and wetlands: toward a bio-economic analysis
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref34
no DOI — not checkedBenefit function transfer vs. meta-analysis as policy-making tools: a comparison
no DOI — not checkedThe economic value of wetlands: wetlands' role in flood protection in Western Washington
no DOI — not checkedref45
no DOI — not checkedref52
no DOI — not checkedref55
no DOI — not checkedref62
no DOI — not checkedref65
no DOI — not checkedref72
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref74
no DOI — not checkedref77
no DOI — not checkedref82
no DOI — not checkedref85
no DOI — not checkedGoogle it!" Forecasting the US Unemployment Rate with a Google Job Search index SD 32.2010 Francesco Bosello, Carlo Carraro and Enrica De Cian: Climate Policy and the Optimal Balance between Mitigation, Adaptation and Unavoided Damage SD 33.2010 Enrica De Cian and Massimo Tavoni: The Role of International Carbon Offsets in a Second-best Climate Policy: A Numerical Evaluation SD 34
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-10-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1600011"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1600011/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1600011)