Reference health

Why Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD is not VHS vs. Betamax: The Co-Evolution of Standard-Setting Consortia

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1626221
CiteStamped reference-health badge
36/36 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-27

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2234208
Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
resolves10.1038/scientificamerican0290-92
Positive Feedbacks in the Economy
resolves10.1787/206618567362
Regulation and Investment
resolves10.1287/mnsc.41.9.1493
Coalition Formation in Standard-Setting Alliances
resolves10.1177/1354856507075245
The Format Wars
resolves10.1080/09537320802141395
Co-evolution of capabilities and preferences in the adoption of new technologies
resolves10.1162/105864003322309518
The DVD-vs.-DIVX Standard War: Empirical Evidence of Network Effects and Preannouncement Effects
resolves10.2139/ssrn.378340
Standards Coalitions Formation and Market Structure in Network Industries
resolves10.2307/2555589
Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation
resolves10.1007/s00191-008-0108-6
The co-evolution of technology and methods of standard setting: the case of the mobile phone industry
resolves10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00095-0
Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication
resolves10.1093/oxrep/18.1.80
Compatibility, Standardization, and Network Effects: Some Policy Implications
resolves10.1109/siit.2005.1563801
Impacts and dynamics of competing standards of recordable DVD-media
resolves10.1177/097215090100200210
Book Reviews : Robert Williams (ed.), Explaining Corruption, Volume 1. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elger, 2000, xvi + 550 pp. Robert Williams and Robin Theobald (eds), Corruption in the Developing World, Volume 2—The Politics of Corruption. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar, 2000, xvi + 555 pp. Robert Williams, Jonathan Moran and Rachel Flanary (eds), Corruption in the Developed World, Volume 3. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar, 2000, xx + 611 pp. Robert Williams and Alan Doig (eds), The Politics of Corruption, Volume 4—Control ling Corruption. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar, 2000, xviii + 631 pp
resolves10.4337/9781848445055.00011
Standard-setting Competition and Open Innovation in Non-HT Industries: Mechanical Engineering and Machinery
resolves10.4337/9781848445055.00007
Introduction
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511493249.001
Introduction
resolves10.1086/261409
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities
resolves10.2307/2950627
Product Introduction with Network Externalities
resolves10.1257/jep.8.2.93
Systems Competition and Network Effects
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1080.0912
Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1706450
Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History
resolves10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.003
Inter-consortia battles in mobile payments standardisation
resolves10.1007/s001910050016
Market institutions and economic evolution
resolves10.1162/0034653043125275
Quantitative Analysis of Network Externalities in Competing Technologies: The VCR Case
resolves10.1007/978-3-8349-8338-1_5
Dynamische Determinanten des Wettbewerbserfolges von Unternehmen
resolves10.2307/41165984
The Art of Standards Wars
resolves10.1007/bf01199853
An analysis of the process generating de facto standards in the PC spreadsheet software market
resolves10.1016/0167-7187(96)01011-9
Technology revolutions in the presence of network externalities
resolves10.1093/oso/9780199290727.003.0008
Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights
resolves10.3917/jie.002.0147
Standard-setting capabilities in industrial automation: a collaborative process
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.001
Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework
resolves10.1145/219596.219601
Standard setting and consortium structures
resolves10.4018/jitsr.2004070102
Standardization and Competing Consortia
resolves10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199209)43:8<559::aid-asi7>3.0.co;2-p
Consortia in the standards development process
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.002
Leveraging technological externalities in complex technologies: Microsoft’s exploitation of standards in the browser wars
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedref1
no DOI — not checkedStandards Battles in Open Source Software: The Case of Firefox
no DOI — not checkedEinsatz von Klugheit im Innovationsprozess: Intelligente neue Formen der Durchsetzung von Standards
no DOI — not checkedref29
no DOI — not checkedref36
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-27 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1626221"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1626221/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1626221/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1626221)