Reference health
Does Consistency Predict Accuracy of Beliefs?: Economists Surveyed About PSA
2 of 110 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-07
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
25 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1001/jama.273.4.289
does not resolve to a known work10.1111/1468-0297.00231
The 108 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00302
Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
resolves10.1162/00335530360535153
"Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences
resolves10.1287/opre.1070.0485
Cumulative Dominance and Heuristic Performance in Binary Multiattribute Choice
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1692437
Inconsistency Pays?: Time-Inconsistent Subjects and EU Violators Earn More
resolves10.1007/s00355-006-0169-0
Psychology Implies Paternalism? Bounded Rationality may Reduce the Rationale to Regulate Risk-Taking
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.011
Does society benefit from investor overconfidence in the ability of financial market experts?
resolves10.1257/jep.11.3.105
Bridging the Gap Between the Public's and Economists' Views of the Economy
resolves10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.06.005
Market experience eliminates some anomalies—and creates new ones
resolves10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_2
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
resolves10.2307/3312889
Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for "Asymmetric Paternalism"
resolves10.1086/322812
What Makes People Think Like Economists? Evidence on Economic Cognition from the “Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy”
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00041
Systematically Biased Beliefs about Economics: Robust Evidence of Judgemental Anomalies from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy
resolves10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00119-2
Prostate cancer screening: the problem of overdiagnosis and lessons to be learned from breast cancer screening
resolves10.1023/A:1011105524935
Dynamic Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: An Experimental Investigation of Choices Between Accumulator Gambles
resolves10.1093/rfs/hhm075
Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/<i>N</i>Portfolio Strategy?
resolves10.1093/jnci/95.12.868
Lead Times and Overdetection Due to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Estimates From the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2007.11.003
Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment
resolves10.1037/0033-295x.102.4.684
How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.
resolves10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.425
Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999).
resolves10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738022.003.0004
Dynamics of Inductive Inference in a Unified Framework
resolves10.1017/cbo9780511618031.006
Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon
resolves10.5860/choice.34-4545
Human judgment and social policy: irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00014
Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
resolves10.1287/mnsc.1050.0448
Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes
resolves10.1007/s11238-006-9000-8
“Take-the-Best” and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When they Work “Well” with Binary Cues
resolves10.1056/nejmoa012794
A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy with Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00654.x
Are Judgment Errors Reflected in Market Prices and Allocations? Experimental Evidence Based on the Monty Hall Problem
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02751.x
Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test?
resolves10.1007/bf01064183
Generalized similarity judgments: An alternative explanation for choice anomalies
resolves10.1001/jama.1995.03520260051032
Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00400
Experimental Economics From the Vantage‐point of Behavioural Economics
resolves10.2307/2234076
Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-Transitive Choice?
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.006
Preference reversals and disparities between willingness to pay and willingness to accept in repeated markets
resolves10.3386/w15350
How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness
resolves10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00180-5
Interpretation of prostate cancer screening events and outcomes: a focus group study
resolves10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00106
“Economics and Psychology”? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting*
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2006.07.003
Tit for tat: Foundations of preferences for reciprocity in strategic settings
resolves10.1177/0272989x04263163
Avoidance of Anticipated Regret: The Ordering of Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests
resolves10.1257/jel.38.2.332
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
resolves10.1097/01.ogx.0000182891.27267.57
Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment
resolves10.1257/0002828042002714
The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences
resolves10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00013
Screening for Prostate Cancer: Recommendation and Rationale
resolves10.1093/jnci/94.13.957
Press Release: Prostate Cancer Incidence Trends Reveal Extent of Screening-Related Overdiagnosis
resolves10.1001/jama.1995.03530210031026
Inadequate Functional Health Literacy Among Patients at Two Public Hospitals
resolves10.1257/jep.10.1.177
Does Studying Economics Discourage Cooperation? Watch What We Do, Not What We Say or How We Play
The 25 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGames that Doctors Play Twolayered Agency Problems in a Medical System
no DOI — not checkedref20
no DOI — not checkedThe Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Marketlike Experimental Settings
no DOI — not checkedref32
no DOI — not checkedref40
no DOI — not checkedEconomists' Views About Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics
no DOI — not checkedInterpreting Recent Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality
no DOI — not checkedRethinking Rationality
no DOI — not checkedref59
no DOI — not checkedWhen Ignorance Is Bliss
no DOI — not checkedThe Concept Of Accuracy In Social Judgment
no DOI — not checkedRational Expectations and the Limits of Rationality: An Analysis of Heterogeneity
no DOI — not checkedref71
no DOI — not checkedref73
no DOI — not checkedref81
no DOI — not checkedref83
no DOI — not checkedref95
no DOI — not checkedGames with Procedurally Rational Players
no DOI — not checkedInformation, Evolution and Utility
no DOI — not checkedref105
no DOI — not checkedWhat Is Bounded Rationality?
no DOI — not checkedref113
no DOI — not checkedref124
no DOI — not checkedref125
no DOI — not checkedref131
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1692320"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1692320/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1692320)