Reference health
Explaining Young Mortality
21/21 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-10
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/s0167-6687(02)00185-3
A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables
resolves10.1111/j.1539-6975.2006.00195.x
<scp>A Two‐Factor Model for Stochastic Mortality with Parameter Uncertainty: Theory and Calibration</scp>
resolves10.1080/10920277.2009.10597538
A Quantitative Comparison of Stochastic Mortality Models Using Data From England and Wales and the United States
resolves10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.12.005
Mortality density forecasts: An analysis of six stochastic mortality models
resolves10.1002/sim.4780060406
Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age–period–cohort models
resolves10.1177/1471082X0600700103
Smoothing the Lee–Carter and Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality forecasting
resolves10.2139/ssrn.1396201
Backtesting Stochastic Mortality Models: An Ex-Post Evaluation of Multi-Period Ahead-Density Forecasts
resolves10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.06.006
Evaluating the goodness of fit of stochastic mortality models
resolves10.23846/ow3.ie71
http://www.3ieimpact.org/en/publications/3ie-impact-evaluation-reports/3ie-impact-evaluations/impact-evaluation-report-71/
resolves10.1353/dem.2001.0036
Evaluating the performance of the lee-carter method for forecasting mortality
resolves10.1016/j.insmatheco.2005.12.001
A cohort-based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedStochastic projection methodologies: Further progress and P-Spline model features, example results and implications
no DOI — not checkedref9
no DOI — not checkedref10
no DOI — not checkedInstitute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries
no DOI — not checkedref12
no DOI — not checkedref14
no DOI — not checkedref19
no DOI — not checkedNational population projections 1992-based
no DOI — not checkedNational population projections: review of methodology for projecting mortality
no DOI — not checkedNational population projections 2000-based
no DOI — not checkedref24
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1703446"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1703446/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.2139/ssrn.1703446)